bloodline wrote:
TheMagicM wrote:
@bloodline:
My post wasnt intended as a "stay out and stfu" either. Dont want you to take it the wrong way.
No, but I am unnecessarily and unintentionally winding people up... No one here is really give good answers (probably because the purchase of such a system is irrational) it is probably best for me to quieten down.
Just because you do not agree with the answers does not mean that they are not valid for the people offering them to you, and I might add for the majority of the Amiga addicts here. One could argue that any Amiga or Amiga like purchase or development is irrational, but that is not going to stop us from enjoying the many different choices.
Some people have valid points when it comes to MOS price. I'm going to pay the $250 price because I'm putting my race car back together, getting married Aug 2nd, honeymoon 2 weeks later, have kids..so registering MOS will happen in August for me.
But the argument of this is faster than that, why run this? Comparing a full featured OS like OSX, Windows, Linux, just isn't fair. The Amiga world turns slow..it takes a while for things to happen. :-)
Well, In the past I criticized AOS4.0 because unlike MOS (which came with the PEG or could be DL for free for PowerUP boards) and AROS, one had to pay for it... which I felt was stupid and fleecing Amiga users... I would be a hypocrite if I didn't offer similar objection to this news.
If the MOS team were to release some amazing Music or Video editing program tomorrow which was a totally radical approach to such work... and they tied it to MOS... in an instant the price becomes justified, for example.[/quote]
There are many that think because the Amiga and MOS userbase is so small everything should now be free. That makes no sense to me. The developers have never said that they were doing all this work just for their own enjoyment with no plans to try to recoup some/all of their investment in time and equipment.
What the developers have done is provide a more modern OS that is "Amiga-like", can run much of the legacy Amiga programs and gives the rest of the few remaining Amiga developers something to build new applications on that will run many times faster than the aging Classic Amiga hardware.
So now maybe some good applications will show up in time. There is also hope that MOS2.0 will be ported to faster hardware that is easily available at a reasonable price, like used PPC Macs. I would love to see MorphOS2.0 optimized to run on the G5 Mac hardware. Given that MOS2.0 is tiny and lightning fast compared to any Mac OS and the fact that Amiga developers have always been able to create small fast code for applications, we could see some great advances in the areas of application development over the next few years while the OS is moved to the next level and ported to something exciting like Cell or what ever is next in CPU development.
In short, MorphOS2.0 is a step in the right direction, and NO, I am not talking about the Amiga or MorphOS overtaking Windows or MacOS in the next ten years. I am talking about survival and actually some kind of growth after years of decline.