LoadWB wrote:
And this feedback change... I wonder if that's why my feedback suddenly jumped up by like 50 or so points. Maybe they're counting multiples from the same people (didn't use it.) This new policy is a bad idea...
I have to disagree. I'd much rather have a system where I can leave negative feedback for someone who screws me over than one where I _have to_ leave positive feedback or risk no one wanting to do business with me. I have some xeon servers lying around and might sell one or two on ebay soon to offset the cost of buying amiga stuff. I would hate to have people not bid on them because some loser who misrepresented something I bought decided to blast me in the feedback.
There have been several occasions when I bought on ebay and really wanted to leave negative feedback but didn't feel I could. Yesterday was the first time I've _ever_ left negative feedback (and it was deserved, honest, and impersonal, as it should be) and it only happened because of this new policy. I'm happy that other buyers will know to be cautious with the seller in question.
For any market to function properly, consumers need to be able to communicate freely with each other, and that's what the feedback system is for, now. It used to be for coercing people into providing a reference for sellers who bend the rules or misrepresent what they are selling.
I know that it may seem unfair to some people whose scores have fluctated wildly since yesterday, but I think that you will see the ratings stabilize and become much more useful after some time has passed. Also, people are (I hope) smart enough to actually read the feedback left and realize that one upset buyer does not make a bad seller. Anyone who sells enough is bound to have a negative or two, just by chance, but positive feedback left from now on will mean a lot more (to me, anyway) than it did before.