Picasso96 or Cybergraphx?

[Mauro73]

Can the two coexist?

Is there a way to uninstall one of them, cybergraphx for example?

My purpose is to try both the systems (picasso96 and cybergraphx) and see which is the best.

Mauro

[Framiga]

"Can the two coexist?"

nope you can't.

Create 2 boot partition, one with CGX and the other with P96.

Then you can compare it! :-)

[keropi]

depends on the rtg card in question... I personally prefer CGX4 , but in cases like busboards or the picassoIV you don't really have a choise...

[Mauro73]

keropi wrote:
depends on the rtg card in question... I personally prefer CGX4 , but in cases like busboards or the picassoIV you don't really have a choise...

I have a desktop A4000 with a CyberVision 64 card.

[Framiga]

stay with P96 then (the better choise for CV64)

[Mauro73]

Framiga wrote:
stay with P96 then (the better choise for CV64)

Thanks a lot for the advice  :-)

[dannyp1]

Yes, P96 is correct.  Excellent advice!

[Mauro73]

is there a reason for my fast ram size decrease a lot when I select a cybervision screen mode (under P96)?

And is there a way to avoid this?

Thank you


P.S. I don't remember very well but it seems that with cybergraphx this didn't happen.

[Flashlab]

Pepsi or Coca-Cola?

[Mauro73]

Flashlab wrote:
Pepsi or Coca-Cola?

Pepsi for ever  :-D

[keropi]

what??!!!??? p96 for cv64? no way! CGX4 is better for that!

[Mauro73]

keropi wrote:
what??!!!??? p96 for cv64? no way! CGX4 is better for that!

I've tried P96 yesterday and it was really a straight forward way to change screen resolution and find hardware limitations in a snap.

May you tell me why do you think CGX4 is better?

And by the way, may you tell me a link where I can download CGX4?

Thank you very much in advance

Mauro

[keropi]

cgx4 is still sold in places like amigakit.com , and is really really better than p96. I have both (p96 on picassoIV and cgx4 on g-rex4000D / cv64 / piccoloSD64)
CGX4 is always preffered by me, because of it's easy setting progs, and it's memory management... you might call it a personall taste, but for me cgx4 is way better.

[Mauro73]

keropi wrote:... you might call it a personall taste, but for me cgx4 is way better.

Ok, so it's most of all a personal taste matter, isn't it?

Anyway, I'll try CGX4 too, just to have a better idea of what are the posibilities  :-)

[Framiga]

Mauro73 ... try by yourself (i already did) and you will see! ;-)

ah, btw ... i'm speaking about everyday usage NOT benchmark crap!