Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: SFS errors out of the blue  (Read 13230 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show only replies by Framiga
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #29 on: December 22, 2007, 02:30:46 PM »
Quote

ChrisH wrote:
Weird, because the long file name corruption bug was 100% reproducible for me - and won't ever be fixed, because development was stopped years ago :-(


have you ever set the FNSIZE=107 option during the PFS format?

Otherwise you will have only 32 char available

Logged
 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show only replies by Framiga
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #30 on: December 22, 2007, 02:34:15 PM »
how old is your HD, moto?

Logged
 

Offline motorollinTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #31 on: December 22, 2007, 02:35:27 PM »
Not sure. I bought it from AmigaKit some time within the last year, but I don't know whether it was brand new when I got it.

--
moto
Logged
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline motorollinTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #32 on: December 22, 2007, 02:47:59 PM »
I started a backup using ABackup but I'm not sure I like the idea of using an app to back up - I'd rather use LHA. Would somebody mind giving me the correct LHA command to back up a whole partition including all subdirectories and keep all protection bits etc? I know I should check the command line options and figure it out for myself, but I would rather not take any chances if I'm backing up and formatting.

--
moto
Logged
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by LoadWB
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #33 on: December 22, 2007, 02:59:48 PM »
@moto:

I use lzx for such backups.  Of the top of my head I cannot remember the command line options, but you'll want to recurse into directories, maximum compression (if you need it,) and retain all file attributes.

I make sure that my current working directory is the parent of the directory tree I want to backup, and use #? as my filename pattern.

Follow my advice and you'll probably have to play with a couple of commands to get it right.  I'm sure someone will give you something more definitive... I hope!  :-D

[EDIT]: Also, test your archive when you're done creating it.  That way you can be sure that the file will extract and that you got all the files you were expecting.  Playing with the file mask has always been my Achilles heel, as in some programs #? seems to ONLY get files and no directories.
Logged
 

Offline motorollinTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #34 on: December 22, 2007, 03:11:56 PM »
Cheers LoadWB. Will look in to the syntax of LZX.

--
moto
Logged
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline ChrisH

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 92
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by ChrisH
    • http://cshandley.co.uk/email
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2007, 05:41:30 PM »
Quote
Typically SFS seems to topple over when used a bit more heavily. Say, it isn't perhaps that typical to try to copy 100GB data to the partition at once.

Ouch.  I've only ever had about 2GB of Amiga files in any partition (mainly because backing-up was a right royal pain).

I would suggest discussing it with the current maintainer of SFS, but I assume you already tried that...
Logged
Author of the PortablE programming language.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show only replies by Framiga
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2007, 06:14:12 PM »
@Piru

i have a doubt about this thing:

in a mixed enviroment like mine on an A4000, with UWSCSI on CSPPC and an IDE on the internal IDE port, is better to use the same MaxTransfer value for all partitons (UWSCSI and IDE) or not?

mine are:

Mask: 0xFFFFFFFF

MaxTransfer: 0x7FFFFFFF

Logged
 

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show only replies by adolescent
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #37 on: December 22, 2007, 06:38:56 PM »
I have had the same SFS problem with IBrowse that Harry mentions.  Basicly, I now have a FFS system drive + internet utilities, and the rest of my partitions are SFS.  

I'll probably try PFS3 some day.  The unrecoverable problems I've had with SFS in the past make it worth the price tag.
Logged
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3645
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #38 on: December 22, 2007, 07:22:15 PM »
Quote

motorollin wrote:
I'm running 1.277 from Aminet currently, but I notice there is a more recent version on the developer's web page (1.58 Beta).

Shame on you, I would have expected you would have been able to read version numbers.

What is bigger, 58 or 227?
Logged
 

Offline motorollinTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #39 on: December 22, 2007, 07:50:43 PM »
1.277 is smaller than 1.58...

--
moto
Logged
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline Flashlab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2005
  • Posts: 1396
    • Show only replies by Flashlab
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #40 on: December 22, 2007, 07:58:17 PM »
But 277 is bigger than 58. That's how you should read it.
Logged
Amiga 4000D Cyberstorm PPC 060@50 604@200 SCSI 130Mb Ram G-Rex Voodoo3 PicassoIV Paloma Ariadne Delfina Lite

Online Flash version of BoulderDash: Offline...
 

Offline AMC258

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 877
    • Show only replies by AMC258
    • http://www.AMC258.com/
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #41 on: December 22, 2007, 08:02:27 PM »
Right, it should read 1.277 / 1.058 IMHO.
Logged
Get up!  Get up!  Get outta here!  GONE!
  - Bob Uecker
 

Offline motorollinTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #42 on: December 22, 2007, 08:10:17 PM »
@AMC258
That makes more sense. 1.277 is not bigger than 1.58 in decimal. Taking the number after the decimal point and treating it as a separate number and comparing it with the number after the decimal point of the other version number seems a bit perverse to me.

--
moto
Logged
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #43 on: December 22, 2007, 08:11:07 PM »
Version numbers are not decimal numbers.

They're version dot revision [dot subrevision].

Each number should be considered separately. If previous number is the same, look at the next one.

See Wiki: Software versioning#Numeric
Logged
 

Offline AMC258

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 877
    • Show only replies by AMC258
    • http://www.AMC258.com/
Re: SFS errors out of the blue
« Reply #44 from previous page: December 22, 2007, 08:17:31 PM »
Precisely why the decimal point should not be used for that convention.  Nor the comma for the same reason.

Commodore got it right twice:  2.04 and 2.05 :-)
Logged
Get up!  Get up!  Get outta here!  GONE!
  - Bob Uecker
 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »