motorollin wrote:
Faerytale wrote:
"It's not piracy, if you buy a program it's yours to do with as you please so long as you don't distribute it to others"
You never "own" a software you buy. You only buy a license that gives you the right to use it.
You dont have the right to do whatever you want with it.
You have to agree to the license agreement of the specified software.
The EULA to which you are referring is *not* legally binding. An end user has no legal obligation to run software they buy only on the hardware the vendor wants him to. I have purchased a legal copy of OS4, and I am legally entitled to run it on whatever hardware I choose, and there's nothing AInc or anyone else can do about it.
Also, if somebody releases a patch for OS4 to allow it to run on non-Amiga hardware, then this is not piracy, since piracy refers to copyright theft, not the modification of software for which one owns a license.
--
moto
This is the bottom line people, forget the hypothetical bullcrap. If anyone wants to make overpriced and underpowered accelerator cards, then let them stand up and speak for themselves while something actually gets done.
The code is a third party modification or hack, like MagicWB or Executive - jeez at one time, people were all for hacks to make the OS do neat stuff..
If I buy OS4 then it's no-one's business if I manage to get it running on a Mac but my own. The license is valid because I paid for the software, just like paying for Amiga Forever enabled you to run an emulation of Amiga Hardware, on whatever hardware you could get it to run on, and a licensed version of Workbench on top of that. Do you think anyone cared whether OS3.5 was bought for Amiga Forever or a real Amiga?? I highly doubt it. And if it needed a Kickstart image, then I'd go out and get one of those too, just as I did with Amiga Forever. This needs to happen and it could be the final resolution to this stupid situation. There's software, but no hardware.. give me a break, get it on a Mac already!!!!!
Believe it that I would have an i-Mac & OS4.0 for Christmas if this was to happen - and severely tempted to retire my dual Ghz G4 Quicksilver to Amiga OS when that is eventually replaced, and I have a feeling I won't be the only one.
I also believe that once this takes off, or goes viral, it might speed up some sort of resolution to this legal mess that might not take another damn 13 years - and I'm so looking forward to another 13 years of that, not. Unless of course, people are afraid the soap opera will finish? Are Amiga folk just soap addicts now? I hope not!
If the Minimig could work, and it should, then there's no reason for this not to either.
PS; I do understand the licence doesn't grant the purchaser anything more than running the software, so the purchaser can make no claim upon copyright or 'ownership' of the actual code itself. To make the car analogy again, if I want to chop up a Ford Focus and make it look like a Ferrari on crack, then it's my perogative, although I might have damaged any warranty claim I might have with Ford, but if I own a factory, I can't go out and reproduce Ford Focus' and start flogging them at half price because I bought one legit. Anyone making a legal threat saying you can't run OS4.0 on a Mac if you get it work is having a proper laugh, and I'd be interested to see anyone issuing cease and desist letters to purchasers of it.