redrumloa wrote:
You have got to be pulling my leg :-?
Hey, I'm not defending them in any way here. It's really none of my business. I just don't understand why people adopt such a... what's the word... hostile maybe, attitude about all of this, then expect Amiga Inc to be their biggest supporters and buddies.
So, AI messes up again. No real surprise there, but does it really need 5 different threads with everyone adapting a "b*tchbunny" attitude to discuss it? In my viewpoint, I really don't care, but I ponder whether anyone on the planet was actually surprised, or whether everyone is just using this as "yet another excuse to beat the dead horse"?
I'm sure there's more to the story. There's always AI's side we haven't heard, though honestly I'm not sure I'd believe it at this point either.
All I'm saying is it would be nice for a change to have both sides of an issue before rolling out the ancient head chopping machine, unless all this bashing is just a matter of fodder for the entertainment mill, in which case, fire away..
Wayne
edit : strictly guessing and playing devil's advocate here, I would say that Amiga Inc and the city of Kent had an agreement and/or maybe even a contract which specified how much and when was to be paid.
Then, when the initial story broke and Kent officials were slammed with dozens of armchair lawyer types from {bleep}bunny to include our favorite Amiga stalkers and the 10,000 pages of "evidence", they (kent officials) probably got nervous, did a little investigating, and wanted to change the terms of the deal to include more cash up front.
Since that wasn't part of the original deal, Amiga Inc walked. Again, I haven't heard from or talked to anyone, but if I were to guess as to what AI's side of the story might be....Wayne