> What your saying then is that OS4 is entirely 68K then?
Wow, that's some conclusion to draw from what I said. OS4 is not 68k only, but there are components which remain 68k. I can't remember exactly which, but they were claimed not to be performance critical. Anyway, I'm guessing they wouldn't demonstrate OS4 without the 68k emulator. Whether they are able to boot it up "at home" without these components, I don't know. Maybe they are, maybe they are not, maybe they are not bothering with it until they have the emulator. It hasn't been that long since the firmware was completed, and the emulator integration is apparently just around the corner.
> ... if it where 'all' 68K (workbench and all) then you might as well run Amithlon because the big E world is what the entire OS would be then...
Well, it isn't.
> If i had known that they NEEDED this 68K Layer to even boot the OS i'd of thought less of it from the beginning even.
I don't think they need it just to boot. To run OS4 in it's entirety though, they will need it. I guess this wasn't too clear from what I wrote. In my defence, let me say that it was really late (around 0430) when I wrote it. :-)
Kay