Partner tracking via sattelite

[Dandy]

http://www.track-your-partner.com/

Unbelieveable - it works!

(Caution!
Some people seem to see something immoral there - but a second, closer look should make clear its just a harmless video-joke - but appearently some prudish party poopers can't bear it to be fooled this way)



EDIT:
warning added

[motorollin]

Remove that link please. This is a family site you know!  :-x

--
moto

[Dandy]

@motorollin

motorollin wrote:

...
This is a family site you know!

And who protects families visiting a zoo, where the animals (e.g. monkeys) make similar movements??
Should the zoos also be removed?

BTW - you should have a closer look - there is nothing immoral.
The actors are dressed (EDIT:)with swimming togs!
Maybe your dirty thoughts made your eyes oversee this fact...  :-P

I'd prefer to leave it to the mods to decide if I should remove the link or not.

[CannonFodder]

Dandy wrote:
@motorollin

motorollin wrote:

...
This is a family site you know!

And who protects families visiting a zoo, where the animals (e.g. monkeys) make similar movements??
Should the zoos also be removed?

BTW - you should have a closer look - there is nothing immoral.
The actors are dressed!
Maybe your dirty thoughts made your eyes oversee this fact...  :-P

I'd prefer to leave it to the mods to decide if I should remove the link or not.

Would you like your children to see such things?

If so then you are a pervert.

[bloodline]

Actually I found it funny... but then I've been reading the Viz Profanasaurus all day... so I'm no moral compass right now...

[Dandy]

CannonFodder wrote:

Dandy wrote:
@motorollin

motorollin wrote:

...
This is a family site you know!

And who protects families visiting a zoo, where the animals (e.g. monkeys) make similar movements??
Should the zoos also be removed?

BTW - you should have a closer look - there is nothing immoral.
The actors are dressed!
Maybe your dirty thoughts made your eyes oversee this fact...  :-P

I'd prefer to leave it to the mods to decide if I should remove the link or not.

Would you like your children to see such things?

You should ask my children if they like to see something like that or not - they're old enough to decide themselves.

Children that are not old enough to see such things should not be allowed by their parents to use a computer without their supervision or even to browse the web without their supervision.

It's the parents responsibility to decide what their kids may see and what not.

Regarding myself - I'm not a prudish party poop or someone that tries to hide reality or fun away from his kids...

CannonFodder wrote:

If so then you are a pervert.

Nope - your toughts appear to be pervet, while jokes and even sex are natural - or are you a prudish party poop?

Are zoos - where animals are allowed to practice REALsex in front of all the kids - pervert, too?

Don't you see that you're going to declare somthing entirely natural as "immoral"?

Or the parents that take their kids out on sunny sunday afternoon for a visit to a zoo - are they pervert as well?
 :headwall:

[motorollin]

Regardless of personal feelings on the subject, the posting guidelines state the following:

No pornographic, sexually offensive, sexually explicit, or objectifying material

--
moto

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Don't be too harsh, people.
Though, Dandy, you could have posted a warning with it. I mean, lots of guys visit this site at work.

[CannonFodder]

@Dandy

How would you like it if someone posted a link to a video of two men having sex?

[Dandy]

CannonFodder wrote:
@Dandy

How would you like it if someone posted a link to a video of two men having sex?

How do you mean it - two men having sex with one woman, or two men having sex with two or more women or two men having sex with each other?
 :-?

Sorry, mate - but I can't see where anyboby in the linked video has sex - as far I can see they only act as if they had.

For me this is a huge difference, you see?

And I presumed that people, who obviously are intelligent enough to use a computer and to browse a computer forum, were equally intelligent enough to recognise this difference.

Or should I be mistaken here?

 :-?

And now I'd really like to back on topic again.

If you take a closer look at the page after that joke-video is over, you'll notice that tracking a person via satellite really is possible.

Originally I wanted to discuss this feature, but some prudish party poopers wanted this discussion to degenerate into a discussion about sex just to distinguish themselves as upholders of so called "moral standards"...
 :egad:

[Dandy]

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:

Don't be too harsh, people.
Though, Dandy, you could have posted a warning with it. I mean, lots of guys visit this site at work.

Thanks for the idea - a really good point. Should have thought of it myself...

Added the warning.

[Dandy]

@ motorollin

motorollin wrote:

Regardless of personal feelings on the subject, the posting guidelines state the following:

No pornographic, sexually offensive, sexually explicit, or objectifying material

Yes - I know.
But you have to admit that "implying" or "pretending" is not included.

And if you take an objective look at it you will see that all they are doing is implying to have sex (or pretending to have sex) - both are dressed for swimming - no real sex involved - nothing immoral.

So calm down, please - O.K.?

[CannonFodder]

nothing immoral.

Not everyone who browses here shares the same morals as you.

Some of us could lose our jobs for clicking on that link.

[Dandy]

CannonFodder wrote:

nothing immoral.

Not everyone who browses here shares the same morals as you.

Some of us could lose our jobs for clicking on that link.

That's why I appreciated this hint and added the warning...
 ;-)

[sir_inferno]

Dandy wrote:

BTW - you should have a closer look - there is nothing immoral.
The actors are dressed!

no they're not