Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Moovid VS Frogger = ???  (Read 3876 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GPTTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 380
    • Show only replies by GPT
Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« on: June 16, 2003, 12:34:23 PM »
Moovid or Frogger?

Witch one has the most support for Divx, 3ivx, mpeg codes?

Witch one is fastes?
NWO tba 2012
 

Offline LP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show only replies by LP
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2003, 02:38:17 PM »
FroggerNG (2.06) is by far the most supportive of the two programs it supports the following media types:

Supported video codecs:
 AVI/QT/ASF/OGG
 DIVX (M$ Mpeg-4) v1, v2, v3
 Angel Potion MPEG-4
 Radius Cinepak
 OpenDivx/Divx4.x/Divx5.x
 Windows Media Video 7
 Windows Media Video 8
 ISO MPEG-4
 XVID MPEG-4
 CCITT H.263
 Intel I.263
 Several MPEG 'I Frame only' video codecs.
                Sorenson Video (SVQ1)
                Sorenson Video 3 (SVQ3)
                Motion JPEG (MPJA, MJPB, Photo JPEG, Rainbow Runner, and other jpeg based codecs)
 3ivx Mpeg-4
 Intel Indeo 3.x
 Apple Animation (RLE)
 Microsoft RLE 8
 Uncompressed RGB video
 Microsoft Video 1
 Apple Graphics (SMC)
 Several uncompressed YUV formats
 Huffman YUV
 On2 VP3
 RM
 RV10
 PSX Video v2 & v3
 MPEG-1 and MPEG-2
 RoQ Video

Supported audio codecs:
 AVI/QT/ASF/OGG/WAV
 MPEG Audio Layer I/II/III
 DVIADPCM
 MSADPCM
 IMA4
 GSM 6.10
 PCM (8/16/24/32 bits)
 TWOS/SOWT
 a-Law
 u-Law
 MSN Audio
 MACE 3:1/6:1
 Vorbis
 WMA 1/2
 MPEG-4 AAC
 RealAudio 1.0
 RealAudio 2.0
 XA Audio
 RoQ Audio                        

As you can see Frogger has a huge list of support, Moovid hasn't got so many codecs to offer but is the fastest of the two. MooVid supports the following:

AVI and MOV files in a single executable.
QT streaming video (QT3+), and QT 64bit files.
INTEL INDEO 3.1 & 3.2 (IV31/IV32)          

The information here is cut and paste from the docs so it should be pretty reliable...

MooVid as I mentioned before is the fastest decoder on my 060, but I guess if you have a PPC speed wouldn't be so much of a problem if you're just going to watch movies.

In short:
Frogger has the best support
MooVid has greatest speed (on my 060 anyway, don't know if anyone will say the opposite)

Hope this helps you out a bit.
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2003, 02:41:15 PM »
No contest. Frogger is faster, supports more streams, and is PPC native. MooVid, as far as I know, is not. And you'll never be able to play a divx on 68k anyway.
 

Offline LP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show only replies by LP
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2003, 02:56:37 PM »
MooVid 1.5 is also PPC native, but it has some twirks to it. As far as I recall it has acceleration on all of it's supported codecs beside INDEO.

The auther says that he'll give all codecs PPC support if he sees interest for it...
 

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2003, 03:29:23 PM »
Moovid is fast, supports divx etc and doesn't crash.
Frogger is slow, crashes but supports lots of formats...
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)
 

Offline Targhan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 818
    • Show only replies by Targhan
    • http://www.geocities.com/targhan_aga
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2003, 06:31:40 PM »
Instead of popping off an opinion, I'll just throw up the URLs :-)

Frogger: Frogger Rules

MooVid: HomePage

I know I didn't answer the question, but I figured the websites needed to be listed here.
Regards,
Targhan
 

Offline Ponos2D

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 122
    • Show only replies by Ponos2D
    • http://www.inet.hr/~dponos
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2003, 08:08:05 PM »
My BlizzardPPC 603e@300(66MHz BUS) is not
enough for normal playback of DIVX in higher
resolutions than 340x280

Maybe it's because of context switching between
68k and PPC

Maybe OS4 for BPPC will speed up the things....
:-(
 

Offline lionstorm

Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2003, 12:46:30 PM »
I would say frogger supports a lot of formats but counterpart is players are not optimised so fully used cpu to play a little mp3.
Both are shareware.
Depends on how fast is your machine.
Lio
 

Offline GPTTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 380
    • Show only replies by GPT
Re: Moovid VS Frogger = ???
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2003, 02:41:40 PM »
I thought it looked like moovide hade more than three supported codecs when I saw there list on therer webbsite.
NWO tba 2012