Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AmiZilla again, sorry  (Read 5289 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline magnetic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2531
    • Show only replies by magnetic
Re: AmiZilla again, sorry
« Reply #29 from previous page: June 12, 2003, 08:48:39 PM »
I remember in 96 when I used to surf the interenet on my A1200 w/dkb Cobra 030@28mhz w/33.6 modem and Ibrowse! :P
bPlan Pegasos2 G4@1ghz
Quad Boot:Reg. MorphOS | OS4.1 U4 |Ubuntu GNU-Linux | MacOS X

Amiga 2000 Rom Switcher w/ 3.1 + 1.3 | HardFrame SCSI | CBM Ram board| A Squared LIVE! 2000 | Vlab Motion | Firecracker 24 gfx

Commodore CDTV: 68010 | ECS | 9mb Ram | SCSI -TV | 3.9 Rom | Developer EPROMs
 

Offline Siggy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 212
    • Show only replies by Siggy
Re: AmiZilla again, sorry
« Reply #30 on: June 12, 2003, 11:06:41 PM »
Quote
In those days Mozilla had nothing to do with Netscape


In that todays Mozilla is larger and more encompasing than Netscape was? - Yes that would be true.

But Netscape has always been Mozilla (a parody on the name of an earlier browser - Mosaic) -- and of course the old joke (when the name was changed to Netscape) it's spelt N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e but pronounced 'Mozilla'..

But when all is said and done, I think the only reason to port Moz to the Amiga would be 'name recognition' on the browser.

Honestly, I'm not really that fond of it.

Siggy.



Quote
The TV business is uglier than most things.
 It is normally perceived as some kind of cruel and shallow money trench through the heart of the Journalism industry, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs,
 

Offline gary_c

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 423
    • Show only replies by gary_c
    • http://www.cunningham-lee.com
Re: AmiZilla again, sorry
« Reply #31 on: June 13, 2003, 07:08:08 AM »
Quote
But when all is said and done, I think the only reason to port Moz to the Amiga would be 'name recognition' on the browser.


When it is all said and done,  the main motivation is that there is no Amiga-platform browser that fully supports current web standards, like DOM and CSS. Actually it doesn't matter what the browser is called. The functionality is what people are after. For example, Genesi is trying to market MorphOS but a major handicap is the lack of a fully functional web browser. They even are doing, or trying to do, STB deals based on the Pegasos. Obviously this will require a modern browser too.

Just like NetPositive was a  major weakness for the BeOS platform (OK, it's a fine lightweight browser but only HMTL3 compatibility), Voyager, IBrowse and AWeb will hold back acceptance of AOS and MorphOS (no offense meant to their developers). A new browser or a port or a major overhaul of an existing browser would be necessary for both AOS and MOS; AmiZilla is one approach that may work. If it doesn't there'll have to be something else or else this will be one more reason for these OSs not to survive.

-- gary_c
 

Offline greenboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 321
    • Show only replies by greenboy
    • http://PhiNiXi.com
Re: AmiZilla again, sorry
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2003, 09:24:55 AM »
Yep, Gary_C, it's pretty freakin' simple, hey? ; } ...But somehow the subject has carried a lot of baggage. If our browsers are so freakin' fast how come their version numbers only go up a notch every 3 years? ; }

I'm actually hoping that a port of say Firebird would have all the teams/individuals with an Amiga browser in their care examining their priorities and either joining in on the Amizilla effort or quitting entirely or getting more happening for their products.

But I understand their predicament entirely, and I do appreciate the early years of sevrice those browsers gave me.
<-- greenboy ---<<<<