3 things :
- UAE vs. E-UAE
- Linux UAE packaging tips
- Availability of Workbench ADFs for honest, legit owners of their beloved OS.
[color=808080]__________________________________________________________________[/color][/b]
I'd like to know the differences between
E-UAE and plain
UAE ; It seems that a fork happenned somewhere, but I can't really find the info about where, when and most of all why..?
[color=808080]__________________________________________________________________[/color][/b]
I just installed e-uae (just by entering "urpmi e-uae" into a shell as root), it prompted me that it had to remove my existing "uae-0.8.25-0.20040302.1mdk.i586" (due to conflicts with e-uae-0.8.28-0.rc2.4mdk.i586) and I said yes.
Now I have a fresh E-UAE 0.8.28. The command is still "uae" so that was a bit confusing.
[color=ff0000]Linux MDV Hint[/color][/i] : To know what exactly has been installed, first look for the package :
rpm -qa | grep uae
e-uae-0.8.28-0.rc2.4mdk
then enter
rpm -qil e-uae
to display every bit that has been installed by the RPM package, along w/ their path, and a detailed description.
[color=ff0000]/Linux MDV Hint[/color][/i]
[color=808080]__________________________________________________________________[/color][/b]
I'm also looking for an idea about a quite sensitive issue : the availability of ADF images of the Workbench system disks. I personnaly own the WB 1.3 that came with my A500, the WB3.0 that came with my 1200, a WB 3.5CD box that came with a secondhand A3000, and a 3.9CD that I bought online at Serele, back when it was still alive as that the last french Amiga retailer.
And yet, last time I needed images of a 3.1WB to install a UAE setup on a linux box, I had to hunt for, well, "pirate" images, that I managed to found, I still wonder how.
It's quite obvious that a lot of people looking for such "illegal" ADFs are indeed legit owners of the WB. Sure enough some are not, & I won't enter the debate wether why them using WB IMGs nevertheless is really hurting anyone, I mean after all they are really getting closer to the Amiga world..?
I'm just wondering, how could we make the images available to them legitimate owners, w/ making thme stealing them (and possibly feel bad about it:shrug:) ?
Because everybody knows that once when Miggies are in the closet collecting dust for ages, even when your WB disks are here in front of you, let's face it, you're still not quite there. And many of those guys want, in fact, not only play w/ UAE, but really get their old
real Amiga running anew !
How to make the ADFs ? :headwall:
- Get a disk-to-ADF from Aminet, transfer it to the miggy in some way
- Power your Miggy and get a system running
- Make the ADFs
- Copy the ADFs to a medium that will be readable by your Peecee.
There's a lot of uncertainty in some of those steps... Seriously, this is
not trivial.
I'm just asking, really. But this seem like a PB impossible to solve. I personally provided ADF IMGs to would-be UAE users in despair:boohoo: that asked me, but I talked to them for some time:admonish:, and they convinced me that they were Amiga users, possessing one (often more) copy of the original WB. I also managed to make two of them actually buy the 3.9 CD from
AmigaKit.
If you ask me, I thing that WB3.1 ADF images should be made public, available from
Aminet. After all, you don't get the manual, and you will not easily make real Miggy disks out of them. I humbly think that would only draw more attention to the platform, eventually leading to new users.
I don't know about you, but I feel something. As Vista gets closer, and Desktop Linux really mature but also really "freezed", a need for a new system is still there. I'm really impressed by the latest
Aros progress. (BTW good
review here) Imagine an ELF executable compatibility layer, a GTK/Zune wrapper and... Oh well, that's another post. :crazy: