why have a low-level format option in your software if all you're going to do is a zero-fill?
Because at some point some anchient drives actually did support low level format?
The user will just have to try it on his drive and see what happens.
And the user has absolutely no way of knowing what happens. It could be LLF, it could be zerofill, it could be nothing. Just because some program has the LLF option doesn't mean that drives actually support it.
I know that the drives I used Disk Manager on exhibited the same symptoms mentioned by the guy who started this thread....Disk Manager low-level formattted them for me and then I was able to do a high-level format and re-install my OS (which was Windows by the way).
OT, but: Windows can get fooled if the MBR is FUBAR. Just clearing the first 512 bytes of the drive usually have exactly the same effect as zerofilling the whole drive (except that it takes couple of milliseconds instead of several hours). Alternatively you can boot from the windoze CD, go to recover terminal and fixboot /mbr. MBR FUBARed drives don't make repetitive noise, though.
No one seems to question that the guy who started this thread low-level formatted his IDE drive ,so why is it such a huge stretch to believe that Seagate/OnTrack Disk Manager can also low-level format drives?
It's fairly sensible to assume he used the HDToolBox Low Level Format option. It was supposed to be used with SCSI only, and has since been removed from HDToolBox completely.
I am not denying that this OnTrack tool can low level format (if supported by the drive). I am questioning if any drive since 80s actually does LLF (according to Ontrack some drive might actually just do zerowrite instead of actual LLF).