Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Wordprocessors  (Read 2921 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DesolatorTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 460
    • Show only replies by Desolator
Wordprocessors
« on: November 13, 2002, 01:35:35 PM »
Which wordprocessor do you guys think is the best one to use? I'm still running with WordWorth 4 SE or something and I feel it's time to update... :)
// Amiga - The computer for the creative mind.
// Ph.D in Amiga future optimism.
 

Offline SilvrDrgn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1215
    • Show only replies by SilvrDrgn
    • http://mikerye.homeip.net
Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2002, 01:51:38 PM »
I use ProWrite v3.3.something.   It's old, but it suits my needs just fine.
Michael
 

Offline ltstanfo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 412
    • Show only replies by ltstanfo
Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2002, 02:15:37 PM »
Quote

Desolator wrote:
Which wordprocessor do you guys think is the best one to use? I'm still running with WordWorth 4 SE or something and I feel it's time to update... :)


I've used several of the AMIGA word processors but after I installed FinalWriter 97 (from Softwood Inc) I stopped looking.  As an interesting side note, they came out with a PC version of FinalWriter a few years back. The cool thing is that it could read the AMIGA version files and import them to the PC.  

Regards,
Lee Stanford
Gee Brain... what do you want to do tonight?
 

Offline jack

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 41
    • Show only replies by jack
Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2002, 03:11:51 PM »
The most stable WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) wp program is, IMHO, FinalWriter97, but it lacks one feature: figures placement inside text, not as sepparate layer. Amigawriter was nice try to be a very good one but it less stable and very memory-hungry. When it came to lots of  graphics inside one document - it ate all available memory (used to have 32 MB then, didn't try it with 64 though). It didn't worth the money I paid for it. Now I'm using LaTeX, which is free, and it's very hard to convince me to go to back to WYSIWYG editor, not to mention the fact that it runs on many platforms, so the same files can be used on Amiga, SGI, AIX, Linux and even Windows. It is wordprocessing language.

My conclusion is:
1. If you need WYSIWYG wp and have lot of RAM or there's no need to include big amounts of graphics -  AmigaWriter

2. If you need WYSIWYG wp and dealing with lot of graphics is essential - FinalWriter97

3. For serious scientific wp, letters , no fancy effects - LaTeX is the only choice.

Jack.

P.S. there's another option - Pagestream, but it is more professional DTP program than wordprocessor.

 

Offline Jose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2871
    • Show only replies by Jose
Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2002, 04:47:35 PM »
I really liked Wordworth7, but I must say I havent used the others much so I can't really coment. How do you think Wordworth7(with the update) compare to others? It's very featured.
Shame Digita stoped it, and is now a tax company or something. Maybe they could license it to someone. It's really a shame why people don't do this and great apps are lost.
\\"We made Amiga, they {bleep}ed it up\\"
 

Offline lionstorm

Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2002, 08:33:05 AM »
I bought WW7 year ago and still use it but it is damned slow on 68060 when you do wordart !
LionStorm
 

Offline DethKnight

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 509
    • Show only replies by DethKnight
Re: Wordprocessors
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2002, 08:59:02 AM »
Quote
using LaTeX, which is free, and it's very hard to convince me to go to back to WYSIWYG editor


 I use KLyX, which is more or less a frontend to LaTeX, and yes, convincing me to go back to WYSIWYG is gonna be difficult to say the least.

wanted; NONfunctional A3K keyboard wanted