Hyperspeed wrote:
But if Carbon Dioxide has 2x oxygen atoms for every 1x carbon then some kind of splitting of this would be really cool for air recycling.
It costs exactly as much energy to break the bonds as making them freed. And since burning carbon gives off a lot of energy (look at your ordinary stove), you need quite a lot of energy to reverse the process. There's no shortcut, nor shall one ever be found.
I wonder if anyone will actually crack the problems of perpetual energy, or at least increase energy recycling. If the sun is a chain reaction lasting billions of years then who knows what could be done.
There is no perpetual energy---not even the Sun is perpetual. Besides, what the Sun is doing is nuclear fusion, and that is a completely different (and much more difficult) game. If ITER works as envisaged, then we are (literally) one step away from creating a commercial prototype of a device which at least is capable of sustaining a fusion reaction on its own. Then it's 'just' a matter of extracting that energy. I hope I live long enough to see ITER's successor in operation. Such a device would rank near the top in the Seven World Wonders of modern engineering.
As for more mundane energy conversion processes, tremendous advances have been made in the area of fuel cells. These turn chemical energy directly into electrical energy, instead of going through the wasteful bypass of burning fuel first, and using
heat to generate the electrical currents. Unfortunately, in order to use normal fuel to extract the energy out of you require some fancy catalysts which do not tolerate sulphur very well; and if
anything is a prerequisite, it is tolerance towards sulphur.