Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Time to Move On  (Read 13783 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline srg86

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2004
  • Posts: 211
    • Show only replies by srg86
    • http://www.aopp12.dsl.pipex.com
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #59 from previous page: July 11, 2006, 02:56:48 PM »
Quote

Colin_Camper wrote:
I can argue with that! You are accessing the internet are you? Even through NAT you cannot access many websites before you start picking up spyware/malware.  :-(


All it needs is a good firewall (mine is in my router), decent antivirus (I use avast!) and don't look at attachments of e-mails from people you don't know.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #60 on: July 11, 2006, 06:45:23 PM »
I must say I've not had a negative error number... or any obscure error in MacOS X, so far it's the most stable OS I've used... but then I don't do anything weird, just running a few professional apps (notably Logic Pro 7.2) and general computer use (Internet, Email, M$ Office etc...).

Windows XP, is a pretty good OS... but I've never had a Windows installation that hasn't needed a complete reinstall after about 12 to 18 Months... WinXP SP2 is sofar proving to be rather good though! Not stable enough for live music work though.

But for mission critical stuff, I stick to MacOS X.

Offline tomazkid

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2004
  • Posts: 123
    • Show only replies by tomazkid
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #61 on: July 12, 2006, 02:41:46 AM »
Quote

motorollin wrote:
Quote
coldfish wrote:
But Linux developers dont charge for the OS, Hyperion/Ainc etc would be wanting money for OS4, making it a commercial venture.
 
I doubt Apple would sit idley by as someone makes money hijacking their hardware?

I don't think Apple would care as long as they are selling hardware. The OS people choose to use on it is nothing to do with them. I find it very hard to believe that Apple would charge developers a license fee for porting a commercial OS to their hardware.

Put it another way: If Hyperion decided to port OS4 to Intel, would they have to pay Dell, Lenovo, Toshiba, and all the other manufacturers of IBM Compatible hardware a license fee? I don't think so.

--
moto


This might enlight you regarding Apple policy about giving away information about their mobo-design.

 

Offline motorollin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8669
    • Show only replies by motorollin
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #62 on: July 12, 2006, 07:25:16 AM »
@tomazkid
Thanks for the link. I can understand Apple not wanting to give away too much. After all, their business is selling hardware. If they give away too much information on the Macintosh hardware then clones may start popping up.

If you read my post a bit further down in this thread, I mention that Linux is already running on Apple hardware. My point there is that you don't necessarily need hardware documentation to port an OS. And if it can be done with Linux, I'm sure it can be done with OS4...

--
moto
Code: [Select]
10  IT\'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN
20  FOR C = 1 TO 2
30     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA
40     DA-NA-NAAAA-NAAAA DA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAAA
50  NEXT C
60  NA-NA-NAAAA
70  NA-NA NA-NA-NA-NA-NAAAA NAAA-NAAAAAAAAAAA
80  GOTO 10
 

Offline Dandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 1221
    • Show only replies by Dandy
    • http://www.wiehltalbahn.de/en/
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #63 on: July 12, 2006, 10:36:55 AM »
Quote

neofree wrote:
...
I want a computer that has...  
Does OS3.x do that?
Neofree

Os 3.x is not a computer.
What do you want - OS 3.x or an computer?
Quote

neofree wrote:
...modern browser, P2P software, video editing software that works with AVI (DivX, XviD), DVD, QuickTime, etc
Does OS3.x do that?

I'm afraid you won't be able to find any *OS* that does this (without additional software)...
All the best,

Dandy

Website maintained by me

If someone enjoys marching to military music, then I already despise him. He got his brain accidently - the bone marrow in his back would have been sufficient for him! (Albert Einstein)
 

Offline som99

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 1566
    • Show only replies by som99
    • http://www.som99.se
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #64 on: July 12, 2006, 11:12:04 AM »
What can i say about this... Why switch system just due to lack of modern features on amiga, why not just use both systems? Well i own a few amigas that i use mainly for games cuz I love the old games and the older games are far more fun to play then modern games.. why you might woudner? well at this point game developers for manly PC is just focusing on one thin "eye candy" they just want all games to look good as hell and they dont mind that they spend so much budget opn that so they loose the gameplay that I loved in the oldest games, well ofcours I got a few pc's even a realy fast one with 4Ghz dual core amd processor and over 2 gig ram and 2 sli used graphicscards, well why do i ghave this computer? well its mainly for downloading games and movies and surfing the net but also used a bit for games but even due to I got a good computer dosent mean I will stop using the amiga I love them, they bring joy even till this day for me and many fun hours when i start to complete a old game i havent played for ages (recently played moonstone for a few days) and well malware and all kinds of spyware and crap that the internet is full of isent a reason to use mac instead of PC, why not? well easy use linux!! its not hard to learn and it got a great suport nowdays even able to play all modern games! but well you still can use a fully patched windows and spend acople of bucks on a good firewall and antivirus program and u never get any crap on it, I use windows XP and windows Vista on my main copmputer mainly and i have a payed licenced copy of Fsecure on it and I never have problems with spywares and malwares, just dummys get that that clicks around on every link on porno pages and if there comes a window with text they are stupid enough to press YES, so wella well protected PC works jsut fine on the internet on all pages. Ops just realized that ive written a long message about nothing lol but well tos horten it up i can say this, Keep your amiga for retro usage and buy a pc and either use Windows XP pro and a payed antivirusprogram and a firewall or just get linux.

//som99 :roll:
 

Offline Waccoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show only replies by Waccoon
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #65 on: July 12, 2006, 12:35:47 PM »
Quote
Quote
Can you run the latest OSX on a Mac that is 6+ years old?


motorollin:  Why would you want to?

Funny how people lambast Microsoft if the latest version of Windows won't work on such an old computer, but Mac people have no trouble buying brand new hardware all the time.

Quote
motorollin:  I really don't understand why you are getting problems like that. I have never had a message like that, and have been using Macs for several years.

I've been using Macs since '95.  I was also the system admin for a fleet of Macs at my college newspaper office.  Oh, the horror stories I could tell -- especially about OS8.  A clean install of that system was a non-stop crashfest.  Just putting an audio CD in the drive caused a lock-up (the 8.1 "superpatch" released 6 months later finally fixed that).

Apple only puts effort into the stuff that matters to casual users.  At the low-level, MacOS and OSX have always spit out tons of indecipherable error numbers.

Sorry, but I'm really sick of people telling me they have no problems with their Macs, but simply putting any DVD in the drive of my mini gave me "error -5862" or some similar crud, with no way to figure out what the problem was.  After lots of google searches, I eventually found out that the problem was a region mis-configuration.  My DVD region was set to 0 (unset), even though the machine is a US model.  WTF?  Was it just not initialized properly at the factory?  According to several forums I've read, I'm not the only one that has had this problem.

I mean, how is it I can use an install of Windows for years at a time, get one BSOD every 6 months, and never get a virus, but my Mac mini crashes just by trying to make an NFS connection and I regularly get error messages I can't decode?

Quote
Colin Camper:  I can argue with that! You are accessing the internet are you? Even through NAT you cannot access many websites before you start picking up spyware/malware.

I've been doing it for 10+ years with no problems.  I've never, ever had a virus, and I don't have anti-virus software on my machine (well, OK, I install something about once a year to actually LOOK for stuff, but I never find anything).

Meanwhile, people ask me to repair their computers all the time, and all I find is spyware and viruses... and AOL.  Everybody uses AOL and AIM!  Blech!

Bottom line: you cannot hold the OS responsible for 3rd party software.

On this note, I find it interesting that people brag about security on UNIX.  So long as an application (like a web browser) can access your Home folder, your data is at risk.  It doesn't matter if you are running as root/administrator or not.  The OS is replacable.  Your data is not.

Moving on or not, the computer industry is not making much progress.

Quote
srg86:  All it needs is a good firewall (mine is in my router), decent antivirus (I use avast!) and don't look at attachments of e-mails from people you don't know.

I have a NAT, and that's it.  I've found that anti-virus software generally pokes around too much in kernel mode and will make your system unstable.  Especially Norton.  I don't trust any software that tries to protect me automatically.

I must say, though, that Outlook Express is pretty braindead when it comes to attachments, such as the infamous "file.doc {50 spaces} .pif"

Quote
bloodline:  I've never had a Windows installation that hasn't needed a complete reinstall after about 12 to 18 Months...

Win95 was a nightmare.  I had to re-install it every 3-6 months.  My current system, Win2K, hasn't been re-installed in four years and I use it every day for both gaming and programming.  Oh yeah, and with an Apache/MySQL combo in the background, it still boots in ~20 seconds.

My ex-boss just bought a new Prescott-based computer for his store, and it takes more than two minutes to boot up.  It's a Hewlett Packard, loaded with background processes and Norton Internet Security.  Need I say more?

I wonder how long it'll be before he calls me, asking me to re-install it.  He didn't get the "backup CD" option, either, so it will only re-install by copying one hard drive partition onto another (another terrific, modern innovation.  Ugh.)
 

Offline blakespot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 884
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Visit ByteCellar.com
    • Show only replies by blakespot
    • ByteCellar - The Vintage Computing Blog
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #66 on: July 13, 2006, 06:05:05 PM »
Quote

Waccoon wrote:

Funny how people lambast Microsoft if the latest version of Windows won't work on such an old computer, but Mac people have no trouble buying brand new hardware all the time.


Mac people have less of a need to keep purchasing new hardware.  My lowest-end Mac (well, aside from my 7.8MHz Mac Plus) is a iBook G3 700.  I got it just over four years ago, in 2002.  I have been on top of every release of OS X and every consecutive release has the machine running faster, more efficiently.  It runs faster now than it did the day I bought it over four years ago.  

It's a very different situation with Windows.


Quote

I've been using Macs since '95.  I was also the system admin for a fleet of Macs at my college newspaper office.  Oh, the horror stories I could tell -- especially about OS8.  A clean install of that system was a non-stop crashfest.  Just putting an audio CD in the drive caused a lock-up (the 8.1 "superpatch" released 6 months later finally fixed that).


Oh, I agree with you there.  While the Mac OS was, early on, innovative as far as pioneering the desktop metaphor to the masses, the OS itself was weak.  OS 9 on down's kernel is, in many ways, inferior to that of Windows 95.  

Some of the machines I owned in the 80s and early 90s were Macs, but I stepped away to the PC - to NEXTSTEP for Intel v3.2 on a then $4500 486 66 setup.  I did not come back to the Mac until NeXT took over Apple and announced that NEXTSTEP would be come the basis for Apple's operating systems.  


Quote

Sorry, but I'm really sick of people telling me they have no problems with their Macs, but simply putting any DVD in the drive of my mini gave me "error -5862" or some similar crud, with no way to figure out what the problem was.  After lots of google searches, I eventually found out that the problem was a region mis-configuration.  My DVD region was set to 0 (unset), even though the machine is a US model.  WTF?  Was it just not initialized properly at the factory?  According to several forums I've read, I'm not the only one that has had this problem.


This, I'll disagree with.  I have an OS X kernel panic or other unexplained error a little less than once per year on my main machine (currently a dual G5 2.5 Mac).  They happen so infrequently that my first reaction is that I must have had a hardware failure.  I find that amusing, really.

Quote

I mean, how is it I can use an install of Windows for years at a time, get one BSOD every 6 months, and never get a virus, but my Mac mini crashes just by trying to make an NFS connection and I regularly get error messages I can't decode?


I am forced to reboot my work PC running XP SP2 about once every other day due to a lockup of one type or another.




At any rate, my main machines are that dual G5 2.5 w/ 30" Cinema and my somewhat new MacBook Pro 2GHz (which runs NEXTSTEP just fine).  I couldn't be happier or more productive, really.  

Of course, I have a couple of Amigas in the computer room, as well.  :-)





blakespot
:: ByteCellar.com - The Vintage Computing Weblog
:: Amigas: 1000, 2000 '020, SAM440ep-Flex
 

Offline TheMagicM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2857
    • Show only replies by TheMagicM
    • http://www.BartonekDragRacing.com
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #67 on: July 13, 2006, 06:53:38 PM »
I'd pay $100 to get a beta version of AOS4 or MOS running on a Mac Mini.. legal that is.. supported by Hyperion or MOS Dev team.
PowerMac G5 dual 2.0ghz/128meg Radeon/500gb HD/2GB RAM, MorphOS 3.9 registered, user #1900
Powerbook G4 5,6 1.67ghz/2gb RAM, Radeon 9700/250gb hd, MorphOS 3.9 registered #3143
 

Offline sir_inferno

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 1037
    • Show only replies by sir_inferno
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #68 on: July 13, 2006, 07:12:50 PM »
Quote

TheMagicM wrote:
I'd pay $100 to get a beta version of AOS4 or MOS running on a Mac Mini.. legal that is.. supported by Hyperion or MOS Dev team.


now _that's_ an idea
 

Offline sir_inferno

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 1037
    • Show only replies by sir_inferno
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #69 on: July 13, 2006, 07:16:10 PM »
Quote

blakespot wrote:


I am forced to reboot my work PC running XP SP2 about once every other day due to a lockup of one type or another.


blakespot


i havn't had to reboot once on my "browsing and chatting" machine since i installed xp...if anything buggers up, i can actually use task manager to end the process, and tadaa!

my windows 95 machine crashes and burns whenver something buggers up...

i've never had to reinstall windows xp on my computers for any reason but hard drive failiure...i've never gotten a virus (that's infected me) and i've never had spyware/adware (/me hugs spybot)...

i love HP computers...they come pre-installed with so much bollocks...and when you just msconfig all of them away, ppl are like what the hell did you do to it??!?!?! it runs a million times faster
 

Offline uncharted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1520
    • Show only replies by uncharted
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #70 on: July 14, 2006, 09:06:04 AM »
Quote

Waccoon wrote:

Sorry, but I'm really sick of people telling me they have no problems with their Macs,


And maybe we're sick of you whinging like a little kid every time that Macs get brought up in a thread.

If you really are having that many problems then please please please, for the love of god, please sell the {bleep}ing thing and be done with it.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #71 on: July 14, 2006, 09:11:42 AM »
Quote

uncharted wrote:
Quote

Waccoon wrote:

Sorry, but I'm really sick of people telling me they have no problems with their Macs,


And maybe we're sick of you whinging like a little kid every time that Macs get brought up in a thread.



I'm curious how the errors are generated... I use my MacBook Pro for mission critical tasks, I'm very keen to know what to avoid that's going to cause problems!

Offline Frags

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by Frags
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #72 on: July 14, 2006, 01:45:07 PM »
Quote

Colin_Camper wrote:

I can argue with that! You are accessing the internet are you? Even through NAT you cannot access many websites before you start picking up spyware/malware.  :-(


I would like to be infected with malware - which web pages do I have to visit?

I use Win2k with no firewall (my computer is plugged straight into my cable-modem) and no anti-anything software whatsoever.  The only malware I`ve ever been `infected` with is StarForce ;o)

I think all this talk about windows boxes being instantly swamped with insidious programmes within seconds of plugging in the ethernet is just bluster.  I would be fascinated to be proven wrong though and I`m not fussed about having to reinstall windows if necessary...
-insert clever profundity here-
 

Offline DamageX

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 339
    • Show only replies by DamageX
    • http://www.hyakushiki.net/
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #73 on: July 14, 2006, 06:53:46 PM »
Quote
I think all this talk about windows boxes being instantly swamped with insidious programmes within seconds of plugging in the ethernet is just bluster.

Apparently it depends on the ISP. Some of them block certain things, others give out free trials for av/firewall software...

I think it would be excellent if MOS or OS4 were made to run on some cheap PPC Macs. That is the only situation under which I would be interested in using any of them, either MOS, OS4, or a Mac.
 

Offline Gojirax

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2004
  • Posts: 178
    • Show only replies by Gojirax
Re: Time to Move On
« Reply #74 on: July 14, 2006, 07:14:16 PM »
http://www.smileycentral.com/

http://www.doubleclick.com/

Surf those for a bit on your unprotected Windows box.

Also google some fun stuff like:

"Free wallpaper"
"Free smilies"

For some detail on some of the better rootkit spyware that will really get your system ready for a good FDISKing look up "Cool Web Search"

*EDIT*
Oh, don't forget a really nice peer to peer file sharing application from Kazaa:
http://www.kazaa.com/

It installs spyware that's actually required for it to run. When you run Ad-Aware or Spybot (Insert fave cleaning program) etc on it and remove the spyware and Kazaa will say "A critical component for this program to run is missing, click here to reinstall it."

Have fun infecting, and I would advise anyone that gets an Email from this guy over the next month to filter it to the trash can.  :crazy: