Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Clearing up acronyms  (Read 4056 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline biggun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2006
  • Posts: 397
    • Show only replies by biggun
    • http://www.greyhound-data.com/gunnar/
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #14 from previous page: April 26, 2006, 05:32:46 PM »
Many years ago when you could put just a few hundret thousand transistors into a chip
it made sense to have two chips one for general computing (cpu)
and one extra for scientific mathematical stuff.
90% of the programs and people won't need the FPU and
could save money by not buying it.

Today an average chip holds millions of transistors so reducing
its size by a few hundret thousand transistors does not make any sense.
So today all mainstream CPUs include FPU and MMU.

MMU (memory management unit) is needed for virtual memory and memory protected.
FPU is used for scientifyc math. Today 3d games use it too.

Both FPU and MMU were optional in the Amiga days.
99% of all applications don't use them at all.

The 68030 was the first 68k who included the MMU.
The 040 and 060 both included MMU and FPU into the chip.
But there were low cost version of 040 and 060 (LC/EC) not including them.

Having an FPU will not speed up your normal applications at all.


Cheers
Gunnar

Offline odin

  • Colonization had Galleons
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 6796
    • Show only replies by odin
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2006, 12:23:10 AM »
Quote

Oliver wrote:
Quote

:-o Durons most certainly do! The last x86 processor that didn't have a built-in FPU was the 80486SX circa 1989!

Ooops, sorry, my bad.  Got that from a salesman.  Never bought either of those chips.   :sealed: I'll just shut-it now.

Afaik the only difference is that the Duron has a smaller on-die cache.

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #16 on: May 01, 2006, 12:26:32 AM »
i think Durons have a cache which goes down to 64Kb
******************
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2006, 05:53:41 PM »
.lha (files)

is this an Amiga program compressed file?
******************
 

Offline odin

  • Colonization had Galleons
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 6796
    • Show only replies by odin
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2006, 05:56:33 PM »
It was/is the most popular packer on Amiga yes. WinRAR on Windoze-based PCs can open them just fine. In fact I think the .cab files M$ uses are LhA.

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2006, 05:59:41 PM »
is there a dloadable program FOR the amiga which will uncompress these files (on the amiga) for me?
******************
 

Offline Amiduffer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 1601
    • Show only replies by Amiduffer
    • http://www.geocities.com/laverdiereaf/
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2006, 06:18:02 PM »
click thisaminet page

this is more stuff to go with it diskmaster stuff

and the DM2 webpage .DM page

Diskmaster is the easiest file manager to use for uncompressing for me. You can view, uncompress, and compress files with it.
Amiga 3000D UP and running! Hear that clicking. 8)
Amiga 3000D & 4000D in storage sadly.
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #21 on: May 18, 2006, 06:27:28 PM »
@odin
Quote
In fact I think the .cab files M$ uses are LhA.

Not quite. CAB files have two sort of compression: artichmetic and LZX. The LZX compression was first made available for Amiga by Jonathan Forbes and Tomi Poutanen. Forbes later went to work for microsoft and adjusted his algorithm for CAB files. It should be pointed out that CAB file format is completely different from that of Amiga LZX, just the compression algorithms are similar (LZ77).

Modified LZX is used for compressed html help files (CHM) aswell.
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2006, 12:57:03 AM »
DiskMaster seems only to deal with LHA i need LZX ... ?

any program for that?
******************
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2006, 01:08:09 AM »
How about....

LZX!
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by Tomas
Re: Clearing up acronyms
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2006, 01:24:48 AM »
Quote
AMD Athlons have the FPU instructions built in, while Durons do not.

Really? i thought the main difference with duron was lower cache size.
I always thought that fpu was a standard since the pentium days.

EDIT: NM.. it seems like we came to the conclusion that it does have a fpu  :-P I should learn to read the whole thread before replying..