Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors  (Read 42813 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline koaftder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 2116
    • Show only replies by koaftder
    • http://koft.net
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #74 on: January 11, 2006, 06:02:43 PM »
Quote

jkirk wrote:
Quote
Yesterday Mcintosh launched Intel based machines and they also have their OS running on it. This was done in 1 year. Amiga development is running at less than 7Mhz!


what? i was under the impression that macintosh x86 was under development along side macintosh ppc development for many years. they have been planning this for more than just 1 year.


OSX ran on ia32 from day one.
 

Offline bhoggett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1431
    • Show only replies by bhoggett
    • http://www.midnightmu.com
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #75 on: January 11, 2006, 06:13:01 PM »
I've been saying the same as Dave for about five years now, but most of the time people have just scoffed. I don't expect the reaction would be very different now.

I haven't touched an Amiga or an Amiga emulator of any sort for about two years now, and you know what? I don't miss it one bit.

It's a shame, but the neo-Amigas are no more than toys, as Dave says. That's OK because people can still have fun with toys, but they don't register when people consider real computing solutions.
Bill Hoggett
 

Offline Nitro

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 158
    • Show only replies by Nitro
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #76 on: January 11, 2006, 06:29:08 PM »
Like always to disagree with Dave Haynie, is like going in a catholic church and talking bad about the pope.  Welcome to the new Microsoft.org, never noticed so many Windows fans before. Anyway, Sony takes the Pegasos2-toy so serious that the have their Sony-Europe running off of it.  OpenSolaris found it`s way to it. Along with many Linux distros.  Apple will still have PPC for awhile. Genesi is doing better now more than ever with thier partners.  Not bad for a toy company. Way to go Bill.
Pegasos-II G3/600MHz MorphOS2.4
Efika MorphOS 2.4
SAM440ep 600Mhz AmigaOS 4.1
AMIGA1200DBOX,BLIZZARDPPC40/175,64MB,Mediator1200SX,VOODOO3,SB128, SpiderUSB, 3.9 & OS4
AmigaCD32
 

Offline lempkee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 2860
    • Show only replies by lempkee
    • http://www.amigaguru.com
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #77 on: January 11, 2006, 06:41:01 PM »
Glaucus:

So youre actually saying that 68k has more active users and developers than morphos/os4 ones? ..

i fail to see how you could come up with such an argument, pathetic.

read my post before trying to troll it down.

and yes i have bought ear plugs because thats the only way i can cope with your ludicrus statements :-)
Whats up with all the hate!
 

Offline lempkee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 2860
    • Show only replies by lempkee
    • http://www.amigaguru.com
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #78 on: January 11, 2006, 06:44:10 PM »
chr: ofcourse you didnt because i had an aguement for every thing your orginal posts said.
Whats up with all the hate!
 

Offline Nitro

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 158
    • Show only replies by Nitro
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #79 on: January 11, 2006, 06:48:18 PM »
@CHR_ZD
 :roflmao: OK man, you win, I`ll reinstall the codecs.
Pegasos-II G3/600MHz MorphOS2.4
Efika MorphOS 2.4
SAM440ep 600Mhz AmigaOS 4.1
AMIGA1200DBOX,BLIZZARDPPC40/175,64MB,Mediator1200SX,VOODOO3,SB128, SpiderUSB, 3.9 & OS4
AmigaCD32
 

Offline koaftder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 2116
    • Show only replies by koaftder
    • http://koft.net
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #80 on: January 11, 2006, 06:55:21 PM »
Quote

Dr_Righteous wrote:
...and in 10 years Linux is still unusable by anyone but patient geeks and network admins.

Kernels alone don't make an operating system. BIOS and GUI/CLI are just as vital. AROS is concentrating on the interface first... Top-down design at its finest.

x86 has been obsolete for a long long time... It's been emulated by RISC processors since the late 90's. Even that hasn't managed to kill the instruction set... Expanding it to 64 bits won't kill it either. I suppose I should have said RISC86 instead.

If that's not what you meant, I'd like to know what you think will replace RISC86/x86.

"Support AROS will never have?" We'll see... I meerly suggest it is possible.


Dang... Where do we start....

The design methodology of starting with the GUI and working your way down to everything else virtually guarantees failure in all but the simpliest of projects.

Would you design the braking system for a truck to fit around the design of the wheels? You would most likely find out in mid development of your breaking system, that the rim design would have to be changed to accomidate the braking system. Now you have to redesign the braking system and the wheel.

You would probably want to start out with the engine, then the frame, then the brakes, then the wheels, etc. A from the ground up design, similar to any other engineering practice.

I dont think what you said even apples to aros, as they modeled the kernel first, then wrote the outer layers.

Now for the x86 statement.

How did you come to the conclusion that x86 is obsloete? Then you mention the instruction set. So what about the instruction set? All that really matters is that you can run blah alogrithm on blah hardware with blah efficiency. The c compilers are better at producing efficient assembler code than the majority of programmers out there so thats not an issue either. x86 provides good performance at a reasonable price. Whats wrong with that? I think your main issue isnt hardware, but the quality of software.

Sure, aros will continue to gain some momentum, but it will top out at some point, much lower than linux because it's just not modern enough to be useful to most people. Even worse, as more and more people start developing for the platform, the more bad quality software there will be runining the end users experience. Then aros will gain reputation for being buggy crap and nobody will want to use it except for religious amiga users.
 

Offline uncharted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1520
    • Show only replies by uncharted
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #81 on: January 11, 2006, 07:23:41 PM »
Are there really honestly people who still believe that the Amiga can somehow take on Microsoft?

I mean really?

Here and now in 2006?
 

Offline Hyperspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 1749
    • Show only replies by Hyperspeed
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #82 on: January 11, 2006, 08:02:50 PM »
Wed 11th Jan 2006: Me!
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show only replies by Cymric
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #83 on: January 11, 2006, 08:28:05 PM »
Quote
koaftder wrote:
How did you come to the conclusion that x86 is obsloete? Then you mention the instruction set. So what about the instruction set? All that really matters is that you can run blah alogrithm on blah hardware with blah efficiency. The c compilers are better at producing efficient assembler code than the majority of programmers out there so thats not an issue either. x86 provides good performance at a reasonable price. Whats wrong with that? I think your main issue isnt hardware, but the quality of software.

I agree with you 99.9%. 99.9 because there is a little voice inside me which insists that good algorithms should run on elegant hardware too. I know, in practice it doesn't make one iota of difference save in speed, but that's because I am an engineer by training, and we all have our little fetishes.

Right?

The only thing which truly matters right now is multicore (whether on-chip, or on-motherboard) and multithreading capabilities. The rest is no longer an issue for the normal consumer market. The embedded market is something else, however.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline A3KOne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 70
    • Show only replies by A3KOne
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #84 on: January 11, 2006, 08:36:44 PM »
Quote

leirbag28 wrote:
@A3KOne

 I think you respond unecessarily......as I already explained that....if you read more closely, I think you will get what I am saying. Already said that the Pentium II will win in Mathematical area.

but I think this part of my comment sums it up:

"Just a more satisfying experience is what I really mean.

an 030 cant play Quicktme or edit Video like a Pentium II, but when it comes to responsiveness..........Ah man! Amiga kills in this area."


 Plus you compare unfairly.........add a Picasso IV and a VLAB motion to an 040..and it can do quite amazingly.............no it wont play "DIVX"  but will play Divx quality movies.........one just has to know what they are doing......or if someone took the time to convert it to an Amiga format......you will be amazed.

its all about the Closeness of everything in the Amiga working together and AmigaOS

Windows is a horrible OS, horribly organized.

Amiga wins in Responsiveness and better overall system.

Keep in mind, one can easily say a Pentium II is even comparable to an AmigaONE...in some ways one can see that.......but in reality they would be wrong........as they are judging it based on lack of Apps, including DIVX playback, or FLASH or Quicktime.............these things just need to be written.


I think most would choose an Amiga with 040 VLAB and picasso set up correctly over a Pentium II any day.

Heck.....I personally would choose an AGA 030 Amiga over the fastest Pentium III
 



In the case of my 500Mhz celeron PC, it uses an intel 810 Gfx chipset.  My PPC Amiga had a CybervisionPPC board.  The Permedia2 on a local PCI was probably faster than the intel.
The PC was as fast or faster playing video.  At the time I Got rid of my miggy, there was no DIVX.  The CPU was the bottleneck.  My underpowered x86 win98 box was just as fast.

I agree that responsiveness is an issue...but the fact is, if you ported OS4 to x86 and had it running on cheap PC hardware, it would be even more responsive.  A cheap integrated P4 3Ghz motherboard, with a cheap SiS integrated chip set and shared ram would run circles around the fastest Amiga or clone on the market (or drawing board).

I am posting this from my IBM Thinkpad T23 1.13Ghz P3M laptop with 384Mb ram that I bought used for $400 almost a year ago.  I am running Debian Sarge that I installed for free, and using a wireless network card that I paid $12 for, from TigerDirect. I use OpenOffice and FireFox every day, and If AmigaOS was available for it, I would gladly pay $100 for it...and it would fly...and I would be happy.

The fact is, OS4 was rewritten to uncouple it from the legacy Amiga hardware...unfortunately it has been couple to another dinosaur, the PowerPC.  

If Hyperion or Amiga was serious about moving forward and making Amiga a viable platform again, they would move to x86.  The only reason I can see that they would not, is if their intentions are not for the desktop market anyway...and I think that is likely the case.  I spent more money on Amiga hardware than most people, but here is reality...my antique laptop with Linux will outperform the fastest am1ga solution in every way, responsiveness included.

I wish AROS well, but without official support, I don't see them becoming more than a hobbyist OS.  An official Amiga x86 release could potentially be more.

I want Amiga to succeed.  I REALLY WANT an Amiga solution.  I am not going to pay a ridiculous price for vintage hardware to get it.  You can flame me or insult me or whatever, but here is the truth.  Most people care about how well something works and how much it costs.  AmigaOS on x86 would work better than on PPC, and cost MUCH less.  Most people do not care if the chip says motorola instead of intel on it.  The only people who do are the fanatical Amiga purists, and there are not enough of them left to buy the am1ga to make it a viable platform for the future.

In the end when the question is asked "who killed Amiga?"

The sad answer will be "The people who loved it most."

Even sadder is that they will blame someone else...Medhi Ali and Jack Tramiel are not around to blame anymore, but I am sure that they will find someone.
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #85 on: January 11, 2006, 08:55:39 PM »
Quote
I wish AROS well, but without official support, I don't see them becoming more than a hobbyist OS. An official Amiga x86 release could potentially be more.


If you think any BoingBall OS is going to make a dent in the desktop market, your in for a rude awakening.  Is AROS a hobbiest OS?  Sure, right along with MOS and OS4.  They are all hobbiest OSs and anything beyond that is mearly an exercise in fantasy or out right delusions.

Dammy

Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline bhoggett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1431
    • Show only replies by bhoggett
    • http://www.midnightmu.com
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #86 on: January 11, 2006, 09:43:47 PM »
It's not official support that makes the difference, it's developer support. None of the neo-Amiga platforms have adequate developer support, which is why they are no more than toys for geeks at the moment.

Fun toys for those with the money to burn, perhaps, but still toys.

I think the term "hobbyist" is a bit grand, really. "Cult" would be more appropriate.

Anyway, time to climb back into my box again.  :lol:
Bill Hoggett
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #87 on: January 11, 2006, 11:01:04 PM »
@Sparky

 Sorry.........hehe.....I need that"." key to help me convey my thoughts :-D




@Cymric

Quote:

    leirbag28 wrote:
    Amiga wins in Responsiveness and better overall system.


Absolutely not. Any system where one app behaving badly through unintentional error causes the entire machine to freeze is BAD. Any system which doesn't offer built-in security to prevent unauthorised access to crucial system components is BAD.

----------------------------------------------------------------


Ok then..........why do you suppose many of us Amigans still use our Amigas as Main machines???

Partly its because of its responsiveness............When I am Doing Visuals I use:

Scala MM300
Elan Performer
DSS8
MindEYE
Trip A Tron
Brilliance
AMPlifier

all at the same Time! on a 68030 CD32/SX32  and I swap between them with the LEFT  AMIGA + M key!   Never seen a PC swap that fast!  and still no slowdown.
Everyone knows PC's are massive headaches...I have never ever in my entire life had a pleasurable PC experience. not even with my Pentium 4.......thats why we and all Mac users consistently complain....The Proof is in the Pudding.  PC's just suck and so does Windows. Something is just not right.


Amigas are very productive......imagine if updated properly..........WooHoo!

Im not excited because I am a fanatic......I am excited because I know what this machine can do at such low specs.....and only imagine if there was the AAA Chipset and a 400Mhz 68090 with Workbench 3.6 Nuclear Edition with a free bottle of Plutonium for powering your CPU. hehe!


@Nitro

"Welcome to the new Microsoft.org, never noticed so many Windows fans before."

Hahahahahah!  :-D thats darn funny!  Microsoft.Org hehehe

CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline A3KOne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 70
    • Show only replies by A3KOne
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #88 on: January 11, 2006, 11:13:06 PM »
Like Dave said...Geeks want something cool.

There is nothing cool about 600Mhz G3 other than operating temperature.

Geek toy? No.

Fanatic toy? Yes.
 

Offline bhoggett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1431
    • Show only replies by bhoggett
    • http://www.midnightmu.com
Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #89 from previous page: January 11, 2006, 11:29:02 PM »
Quote
A3KOne wrote:
Geek toy? No.

Fanatic toy? Yes.

I was trying to be polite.  ;-)
Bill Hoggett