Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: XPK Diavolo problem  (Read 1909 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dcr8520Topic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 107
    • Show only replies by dcr8520
    • http://Amiga.SourceForge.net
XPK Diavolo problem
« on: April 09, 2003, 09:11:52 PM »
Hi all,

someone knows a solution for the Diavolo problem using XPK ??



regards.
 

Offline MikeB

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 323
    • Show only replies by MikeB
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2003, 10:44:07 PM »
whats the issue?

im using Diavolo 2000, my compression is set to No compression when using a tape backup device like AIT or DLT, as the device will deal with compression automatically.

Other options are available are:

For 7mhz - Fast.50
For 14mhz - Fast.100
For 25mhx - Nuke.100
Data encryption algorithm - Feal.8


Hope this helps

 

Offline dcr8520Topic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 107
    • Show only replies by dcr8520
    • http://Amiga.SourceForge.net
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2003, 12:16:33 AM »
using XPK to compress a backup to a harddisk-File, later the backup are unusable, a error says something like "This backup cant be restored with this version of diavolo" :-(
 

Offline MikeB

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 323
    • Show only replies by MikeB
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2003, 02:35:29 PM »
m.korndoerfer AT nathan.gun.de

Speak to the author, should be able to help.
I put AT where @ should be stop spamming.
 

Offline shIva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 751
    • Show only replies by shIva
    • http://preshi.blogspot.com
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2003, 03:15:22 PM »
Quote
later the backup are unusable, a error says something like "This backup cant be restored with this version of diavolo"


which xpk library do you use ? i had the same problem here with a corrupt lib.
i use xpkshrink.100 to get real good (but slow) compression.
shIva
the answer is [color=CC3300]42[/color] Support  Distributed Amiga - moo ;)
 

Offline SilvrDrgn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1215
    • Show only replies by SilvrDrgn
    • http://mikerye.homeip.net
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2003, 03:28:15 PM »
Quote
i use xpkshrink.100 to get real good (but slow) compression.

What CPU do you have?  Maybe that's a factor?
Michael
 

Offline shIva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 751
    • Show only replies by shIva
    • http://preshi.blogspot.com
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2003, 03:50:24 PM »
it´s a 060/50. backups run over night. unpacking is much faster, so you can use it this way ;-)

i just tried to find the corrupt lib, but i thnk i deleted it.
xpknuke, xpkshrink (xpkfeal for encryption) run very stable w/o problems.
shIva
the answer is [color=CC3300]42[/color] Support  Distributed Amiga - moo ;)
 

Offline SilvrDrgn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1215
    • Show only replies by SilvrDrgn
    • http://mikerye.homeip.net
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2003, 04:00:46 PM »
O.K.  I was just wondering becuase my backup size is starting to approach the uncompressed limit of my tape drive.  I'm going to have to start using compression soon.  Thanks!
Michael
 

Offline dcr8520Topic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 107
    • Show only replies by dcr8520
    • http://Amiga.SourceForge.net
Re: XPK Diavolo problem
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2003, 10:22:12 PM »
FAST.lib, but I noticed this fail compressing large backups >~1Gb, (or may with entire partitions?) doing the same with dirs of ~250Mb I have not the problem.

Also I try DUKE.lib (I want speed), with the same result. ..I will continue now testing others libs.

mmm... may not help... but can you send me your config file, plz ?


btw, using BZP2.lib, instead of SHRI.lib, the compress are more bigest, and sometimes (with the lib optimized for 68060) more faster.



Thx!
Kind regards.