redrumloa wrote:
Thanks for all the responses! I am going to be upgrading an arcnet network to ethernet and using the existing coaxial would be the easiest route.
Anyone know off the top of their head what flavour coxial arcnet uses?
RG-62, with an impedance of 92 ohms.
Which feels like a bit of a stretch for 10base2. If you're dealing with a home or extreme-SOHO setup, you could see how things fare with 50 ohm terminators and the aforementioned disposable hubs, but if this is anything 'real' - meaning intended to be relied on at all - you'll need to find some true media converters, which probably won't come cheap. (Google's not being helpful for me tonight.)
I find one reference to Windows offering Ethernet-over-Arcnet encapsulation, a trick that could probably be performed by Linux or *BSD as well... that'd imply sticking with the existing Arcnet, and plopping tunnel endpoints on each end. This would, of course, leave you stuck with Arcnet and its speed limitations, but at least you'd know you're in-spec and shouldn't need to plan for replacing impedance-mismatch-torched hardware.
Here's one hit for some more-appropriate hardware:
USENet thread mentioning media conversion hardware..Be sure to read down to the next message, which elaborates on the 'unbaluns' that could be used as well.
Sounds like, if you've got a building/campus full of the stuff, you want to track down a bunch of the mentioned RG-62-capable hubs. If it's just one point-to-point link, you might get by "reliably" with the cheapo Ark hardware, *and* appropriate 'unbaluns.' Or, if we're talking a whole building here, and tracking down enough of the RG-62-capable hubs is trouble, an all-10base2 hub/switch, *and* enough of those unbaluns for both ends, allowing one of the cheapo Ark hubs (or a machine with a 10base2 NIC) to be placed at each drop.
When you get to that last point, just about any alternative- pulling CAT5, deploying wireless, buying a few overpriced HomePNA bridges and recycling existing phoneline- starts to sound good.