Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A3000 UX / A3000 ?  (Read 3402 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest1255

  • Guest
A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« on: June 01, 2005, 11:01:03 AM »
How can i see is my A3000 UX or normal A3000?
Can this be seen from the mainboard or is it the shape or the software?
TIA. :)
 

Offline Linchpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by Linchpin
    • http://www.systemmedic.co.uk
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2005, 11:05:24 AM »
Wasnt it on the badge on the front?

Infact, here it is.

WinUAE Only... OS3.9 with 512mb ZIII ram ;)
 

guest1255

  • Guest
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2005, 11:09:05 AM »
:( :( then mine is Normal A3000,,,
Thank you for the information.
SO what is it that makes it so special?
is it fater or .. ??
 

Offline Linchpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by Linchpin
    • http://www.systemmedic.co.uk
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2005, 11:25:18 AM »
I think it was supplied with a Tape drive and Amiga UNIX. I know that the AmiNIX or whatever its called wont run on 68030 cpus or something (There is a cpu issue with the faster ones) so maybe it has a slower CPU supplied?

Not sure.
WinUAE Only... OS3.9 with 512mb ZIII ram ;)
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2005, 11:34:00 AM »
The A3000UX was released with AT&T Unix V4, iirc.  The machine was a standard A3000 68030 m/b with early roms, the aforementioned scsi tape drive and an A2410 graphics board (for the Unix display).  There was also a version for the A2000 that used special boot roms on an A2630 68030 accelerator.  I once had both machines, having bought them off a guy who worked at the Univ. of Lowell (where they designed the A2410).
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline Linchpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by Linchpin
    • http://www.systemmedic.co.uk
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2005, 01:24:08 PM »
Cool :)

I thought the CPU was different... maybe UNIX wont run on the 060 or something ...
WinUAE Only... OS3.9 with 512mb ZIII ram ;)
 

Offline glitch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 371
    • Show only replies by glitch
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2005, 01:42:08 PM »
I remember that it required the MMU.  Perhaps it didn't run on an '040?  Has anyone here ran it on an '040/060 or just the '030???

-G
 

Offline Failure

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show only replies by Failure
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2005, 02:28:47 PM »
http://amix.failsure.net/tiki-index.php?page=Hardware

:-)

It will not run on 040/060, only 020/030 with MMU.  At least AFAIK.

*edit* There's a guy who contacted me recently that got it installed on an A2000, so there's no special ROMs or anything necessary, again, AFAIK.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show only replies by adolescent
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2005, 03:36:20 PM »
The video card and tape drive were optional also.  Besides the badge, the other difference was some came with a 3 button preggy mouse.
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

guest1255

  • Guest
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2005, 10:00:07 PM »
I know that this question is a little off topic :)
How can i make my A3000 use 3.1 rom (softkick), where do i have to copy the roms files.

Or is it the only way to buy them (rela ones)and replace the old ones?

TIA
 

Offline Failure

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show only replies by Failure
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2005, 10:30:19 PM »
You may find this topic helpful.  I assume that is what you were talking about anyway...

Short answer is that you pretty much need to buy the 3.1 ROMs, unless ye feel like a pirate, matey.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

guest1255

  • Guest
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2005, 10:39:24 PM »
I have an legall AF6 can it be used?
Its nice to have the Amiga working on a real machine :)
I will also get the rom chips soon but cant wait :)
thanks.
 

Offline terminator

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 29
    • Show only replies by terminator
    • http://valleynet.on.ca/~michael
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2005, 01:03:09 AM »
Quote

glitch wrote:
I remember that it required the MMU.  Perhaps it didn't run on an '040?  Has anyone here ran it on an '040/060 or just the '030???

-G


From what I remember, it only works on an 030.

The final version was compiled for the 030, and before CBM could lay off the remainder of the team, they quit.  

Development halted right there and never moved again.

But the Amiga may be the only personal computer that ever ran UNIX. (If not, then it ran the most advanced version ever released for a personal computer.)
 

Offline mjg59

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2004
  • Posts: 32
    • Show only replies by mjg59
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2005, 01:12:20 AM »
Various versions of SVr4 were released for x86, and BSD is pretty definitely a Unix.
 

Offline danamania

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 84
    • Show only replies by danamania
    • http://www.danaquarium.com/
Re: A3000 UX / A3000 ?
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2005, 03:34:23 AM »
Very similar was A/UX, only for 68k Macs. I think Apple continued development for it up until around 1996/97.

http://www.applefritter.com/ui/aux/index.html has a little walkthrough. It ran on some of the 68020 to 68040 boxes from the late 80s/early 90s.

dana