Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Atari vs Amiga  (Read 3154 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Magic-MerlTopic starter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 229
    • Show only replies by Magic-Merl
Atari vs Amiga
« on: March 03, 2005, 03:49:16 AM »
Check this out.  While trying to find out more about the Atari coldfire project I went to the site where Atari enthusiasts were looking at idea's for a new Atari computer.

This is what one Atarian suggested.

Ho Hum!

Atari.org

Offline BigBenAussie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 313
    • Show only replies by BigBenAussie
Re: Atari vs Amiga
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2005, 05:08:14 AM »
HA....Maybe Eyetech should be selling them AtariOnes. :-D
Then they can choose between AmigaOS and err....GEM?
I guess someone's updated the ST UI since then huh?

Ok. Going back to my happy place now. :spy
 

Offline DonnyEMU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 650
    • Show only replies by DonnyEMU
    • http://blog.donburnett.com
Re: Atari vs Amiga
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2005, 06:32:19 AM »
Actually, most of these folks have pretty much saw the light.. They released ARANYM..  AKA Atari Running on Any Machine. It is a virtual machine software for running the Atari ST/TT/Falcon operating systems (TOS, FreeMiNT, MagiC and others) and TOS/GEM applications on any kind of hardware  Including Intel PCs- be it an IBM clone (read it as "PC" :-), an Apple, an Unix server, a graphics workstation or even a portable computer.







other features include:

    * MC68040 compatible CPU (including optional MMU!)
    * MC68881 compatible FPU
    * JIT Compiler for CPU and FPU (speeds up CPU+FPU up to 10x!)
    * ST-RAM 14 MB
    * Fast-RAM configurable 0-3824 MB
    * Host accelerated fVDI graphics (large highcolor/truecolor resolutions)
    * Access to Host OS filesystems using BetaDOS or MiNT native XFS driver
    * Ethernet networking via host using MiNT-Net XIF driver
    * TOS 4.x XBIOS compatible sound (16-bit 48 kHz stereo sound)
    * Parallel port (bidirectional)
    * MFP, IKBD, ACIA, VIDEL, BLITTER, FDC, IDE, DSP MC56001
     
Please note that most hardware emulation is there just to make TOS booting possible. It is not a goal to create an emulator of existing Atari machine. Don't expect that ill-designed applications will work as they would on original Atari machine. Still, compatibility ratio is much much higher than any of the TOS clones achieved so far.

Actually this software could be ported to the AmigaOne. Making it an AtariOne :-)
======================================
Don Burnett Developer
http://blog.donburnett.com
don@donburnett.com
======================================
 

Offline pixie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 480
    • Show only replies by pixie
    • http://savoc.tripod.com
Re: Atari vs Amiga
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2005, 11:56:49 AM »
They have Dillo, a light browser css compliant... and we haven't :-(


pixie- writing from a paradise called Portugal
 

  • Guest
Re: Atari vs Amiga
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2005, 12:02:19 PM »
Quote

pixie wrote:
They have Dillo, a light browser css compliant... and we haven't :-(


Well, we may haave the superior hardware and operating systems, but they're pretty much useless with out the apps to back it up! :-D
 

Offline pixie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 480
    • Show only replies by pixie
    • http://savoc.tripod.com
Re: Atari vs Amiga
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2005, 12:56:00 PM »
I'm so depressed I started a Thread to try to get over it... :-D


pixie- writing from a paradise called Portugal