@smithy,
I see your point, but I don't quite agree with your assessment. While there are two sides to the market as you mentioned, there is simply no valid impetus for the "geek" to spend $500+ on a motherboard when they can buy the whole mac mini and put linux on it for $500.
Like you said, it's about the software, and in the Amiga's case, there is none (other than the OS) and there's no way to generate interest in developers (other than sending them free machines) to build AmigaOS software. There's no money in it for developers to do so, outside of selling POTENTIALLY 1000 copies. No one, outside of bedroom developers, could survive on sales of 1000 copies. This is not the 1980's where bedroom coders are the most talented out there. Everyone with talent is already employed, and that means part-time "weekend" development, which isn't going to lead to the top-shelf applications that the Amiga needs to make an impact.
Take for example a $150 widget program. *If* _ALL_ 1000 AmigaOne owners bought the widget, that's $150,000 gross income. Take out the cost of development, packaging, shipping, promotion and advertising, taxes, and everything else, and my bet is that you're looking at less than $35,000 profit, and that's *IF* each and every one of those AmigaOne users bought a $150 program (which would never happen).
Perhaps it's different in 3rd world countries, but you can't run an office, buy connectivity, buy furniture and supplies, pay the utilities/phone/etcetera, or even provide insurance to employees on $35,000 per year. I'm not drawing parallels to Amiga Inc or anyone else here, but it is very eerily similar.
I apologize. I know that my opinion is potentially offensive considering my position, but if I had the money (which I don't), I just couldn't justify buying an AmigaOne motherboard any more versus the cheaper and complete mac mini, but that's just the way I see it.