Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Windows without a swapfile  (Read 3076 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline whabangTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Windows without a swapfile
« on: July 17, 2004, 01:59:24 PM »
I've been runningn Windows without swapfile for the last week. The performance jump is actually noticable; and my harddrives probably feel a lot better. So far, no applications have complained about the lack of memory, and I generally have around 400 megs of free RAM.
I doubt it would work good on low-memory systems, though.

Has anyone experienced any major difference between 768 and 1024 megs of RAM?.
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline Turambar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 425
    • Show only replies by Turambar
    • http://gentleman-bastards.com/
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2004, 03:09:06 PM »
Interesting. What version of windows are you using? I have 1024mb ram so if you're using XP i'll give it a go too.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2004, 03:11:49 PM »
I run WindowsXP on 512Meg with no swapfile. I am even using massive files as that machine is my Music machine.

Offline whabangTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2004, 04:38:27 PM »
XP Home.
It handles it much better than Windows 2000 ever did.
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2004, 04:46:02 PM »
It's not something I'd recommend for 24/7 use. AFAIK Windows sometimes uses swap to defrag physical memory. Not too sure about that though.
 

Offline seer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1453
    • Show only replies by seer
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2004, 04:54:12 PM »
AFAIK, XP will still use a pagefile. Look in the taskmanager. You may need to add a few columns.

Also, check the registry, HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\DisablePagingExecutive. Page file on or of, it's 0.

I may be wrong, but having used XP with 1Gb ram and no pagefile set, yes the systems seems more responsive. Haven't looked to deep into this tho.

If you want/need a page file, setup windows like it's a linux system. Put it on a different drive then where windows lives..
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
~
 

Offline blobrana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 4743
    • Show only replies by blobrana
    • http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/blobrana/home.html
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2004, 05:33:39 PM »
Yea,
plus you could have a look at these `simple tips` .... (+ 2 red herrings) ;)


[disclaimer : You have to know what your doing]


Offline whabangTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: Windows without a swapfile
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2004, 06:57:58 PM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
It's not something I'd recommend for 24/7 use. AFAIK Windows sometimes uses swap to defrag physical memory. Not too sure about that though.

Well,
you don't truly disable the page-file; you simply make it so small (max 0 mb) that it uses usual RAM instead. It is true that Windows' RAM-handling gets less efficient this way (swapped things get swapped to another place in RAM), but RAM is so much faster than a HD, that you'll think things go faster.

There are ways to disable the swap-file, but this includes serious registry hacking, and will probably {bleep} up your system good.
Beating the dead horse since 2002.