Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?  (Read 5934 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TjLaZer

Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2004, 10:41:26 PM »
I also own both Atari and Amigas.  I own a Falcon030 and TT030 as well as 520ST, 1040 and Mega STs.  They are not bad machines, but the Amiga is flat out better.  Smoother graphics, better sound, and better quality software when it was not ported over.  But since I owned both platforms I love them both. lol
Going Bananas over AMIGAs since 1987...

Looking for Fusion Fourty PNG ROMs V3.4?

:flame: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 

Offline HopperJF

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 1531
    • Show only replies by HopperJF
    • http://www.michael-powell.blogspot.com
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2004, 11:00:55 PM »
Atari is a much more limiting, and cult machine which makes it more exciting to use in my  opinion, and more rewarding when some new software is found.

These factors give me more pleasure when using an ST computer than an Amiga. I also feel that ST computers are better built.  :-)
Religion is for people who believe in hell.
Spirituality is for people who have been there.
 

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2004, 11:13:18 PM »
In the bitter battle, when the A1200 was still fresh, I had the oppertunity to see an Atari in action. Not sure what the "war" was about except for the fact that all Amigans I knew though Atari was evil and it had a big inpact on me for this machine that I didn't know. Anyway I thought I would take a look at this devils machine and although I only got an hour of tinkering it was enough for me to go home happy knowing my A1200 was waiting for me.

I belive that "the two sides" have never stood so close as they do these days though. I guess we're both in the same kind of boat... althoug "they've" given in while "we're" still franticly scooping out water hoping to reach land soon.

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2004, 11:31:43 PM »
Quote

that_punk_guy wrote:
Although on the other hand some Amiga users seem to use Microsoft's incompetence as an excuse to remain completely ignorant of how Windows works, never to bother learning how to set it up properly, install bad software badly, and blame Bill Gates when it f**ks up.
Actually, I know quite how it works. And I was a convinced DOS user, until I discovered the Amiga.
I still need an Atari Falcon to make a good comparison between the AGA Amiga's (still need an A4000) and the Atari Falcon.
Fact is, beseen as gameconsoles, the Atari Jaguar is way much faster than the CD32 (yup, I got both, an Atari Jaguar + cd unit and a CD32).
And I need an STE, wich actually has a blitter and stereo sound, to compare it with the Amiga500.
Anyhoo, how good the Falcon might have been with it's DSP, it did not have hardware multitasking (it had software preemptive multitasking with MultiTOS if I'm correct).

And can anyone delete the utterly misleading term "cooperative multitasking" out of the computer dictionary? The term, wich M$ and Mac used as selling argument? Multitasking my *ss :-x
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline davey

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 6
    • Show only replies by davey
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2004, 01:59:01 AM »
Quote

Hyperspeed wrote:

Amiga is a better `open source' community than Linux ever will be.


Speaking as an amiga lover, that is boll0x.

A number of open-source amiga projects started out on linux and got ported. Open Source isn't about an OS anyway, it is bigger than that, linux is just a home for opensource which began before linux existed.

They gave us uae for starters, dvd burning software, apache webserver, mysql, php & samba which all run on many operating systems. A number of nice applications started on the amiga but how many were open-source ones that none-amiga users will know about?

When I get my latest UAE, based on linux, I will start to contribute too if i can.

Please don't come into an open forum and spout such nonsense, it is embarrassing and shameful.

Back on-topic, I had my amiga since workbench 1.3 came out and fell in love with it bigtime when I got workbench 3.0 (I missed out on v2 but used it enough to know it was special). I borrowed money and persuaded my brother to sell his A500 to buy an A1200 between us. The following year I worked 7days a week in the summer holidays to buy an 80mb HD for about £170 and my love-affair with the amiga & computing generally went into overdrive.

My A1200T with ppc awaits proof that OS 4 will come out for it and then I will SERIOUSLY consider an upgrade. In the meantime I want my core work tools to get ported. This includes firefox browser :( I live in hope.
 

Offline TheMagicM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2857
    • Show only replies by TheMagicM
    • http://www.BartonekDragRacing.com
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2004, 03:04:39 AM »
Its kinda cool to see that there are still people out there using these cool machines.. Amiga or Atari.  I've never used a Atari, nor known anyone that had one..would be cool to see though.   Does the Atari have any games that are "Atari only" that are cool?  Like Shadow of the Beast, SWOS or something?  Does TOS multitask like Workbench?
PowerMac G5 dual 2.0ghz/128meg Radeon/500gb HD/2GB RAM, MorphOS 3.9 registered, user #1900
Powerbook G4 5,6 1.67ghz/2gb RAM, Radeon 9700/250gb hd, MorphOS 3.9 registered #3143
 

Offline BIG-IRON

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2004
  • Posts: 111
    • Show only replies by BIG-IRON
    • http://www.nojohnkerry.org/
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2004, 05:58:13 AM »
NO next question.
BIG IRON (Or \\"heavy metal [Cambridge]) Large, expensive,ultra-fast computers. Used generally of number crunching supercomputers such as Crays, but can include more conventional big commercial IBMish mainframes.
 

Offline pVC

Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2004, 10:44:58 AM »
There wasn't any competition between Amiga and Atari where I lived at that time. Almost everyone had Amiga and some had PC or C64. I have seen ST and Falcon only once and that was only quite recently. So, in our part of the world Amiga ruled and Atari was unknown.
Daily MorphOS user and Amiga active.
 

Offline Amigaz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 1959
  • Country: se
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by Amigaz
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2004, 10:53:21 AM »
Agree, same here in the Stockholm area when I was a youngster.
Never heard of a person who owned an Atari 520/1040 just saw some being sold in papers that's all I saw of them.
My guess is that maybe 1 out of 15-20 people had an Atari the rest had Amiga's.
I'm talking about the period before the AGA machines came out when I had my Amiga which I sold in '93 and now I'm back since 2 years!  :lol:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amiga 4000T - A3640 '040
Amiga 4000 - CS MKIII
Amiga 1200 - Blizzard 1230 MKIV
Amiga 1200 - Stock
Amiga CD32 - TF360
A bunch of ol' A500's
 

Offline Macca

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 32
    • Show only replies by Macca
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2004, 11:10:16 AM »
Yeah the ST has many games - mostly the same catalogue as the Amiga.

I've just recently got a 4MB STE and there are a few games that don't work on it (much like Kickstart 3.1 to 1.3)

The ST in my opinion is much better made - it's a solid machine and even after 10 or so years age it's floppy drive is still working fine.

Also it's much easier to copy games for the ST from the images (.ST and .MSA) by using Makedisk - boot do DOS run that with the appropriate Command Line switches and job done - no need for slow serial cables, etc.


Macca.
 

Offline HopperJF

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 1531
    • Show only replies by HopperJF
    • http://www.michael-powell.blogspot.com
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2004, 11:45:43 AM »
The ST will read DOS formatted disks as well - meaning that you can download software straight from the net, unzip it and put it on a disk.

A lot easier than it is to do on the Amiga.
Religion is for people who believe in hell.
Spirituality is for people who have been there.
 

Offline HE-MAN

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 92
    • Show only replies by HE-MAN
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2004, 12:47:48 PM »
Is there any game that was releast on Amiga and Atari, that the Atari version were better?
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by mikeymike
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2004, 12:52:35 PM »
Quote
Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?


Put me down for a "who cares?" and a "not this old chestnut again" vote :-)
 

Offline HopperJF

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 1531
    • Show only replies by HopperJF
    • http://www.michael-powell.blogspot.com
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2004, 01:14:29 PM »
The Lotus Turbo games were more playable on the ST.
Most earlier games are better on the ST, because the Amiga versions were only ported from the ST versions.
Religion is for people who believe in hell.
Spirituality is for people who have been there.
 

Offline Amiga1200PPC

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 25
    • Show only replies by Amiga1200PPC
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2004, 04:22:06 PM »
Come on Hopper, don't talk bs.
Everybody knows that Ataris are crap :lol:
 

Offline BigBenAussie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2004
  • Posts: 313
    • Show only replies by BigBenAussie
Re: Amiga vs Atari - was there any real competition?
« Reply #29 from previous page: July 11, 2004, 05:27:21 PM »
I remember being pissed off when my favourite game "International Karate" was only ported to the ST. I'm not talking about IK+, but the original game. They even fought outside Buckingham Pallace. Never got to play the game. Hmmm. Methinks I should dig up an ST emulator and see if I can get a hold of it.