That answer was no. I don't feel like he was "beating around the bush" or trying to talk his way out of an answer.
Well your answer was an easy answer, so it was picked.That's not an insult on you, just that much harder hitting questions, like their financial situation or why they ripped off customers were ignored.
I'd just like to know what proof you have to substantiate your claim of "prepared questions".
People send their questions to a biased inidividual who filters out the "unnaceptable" questions. This has been confirmed by the person doing the filtering so it isn't exactly news.
I didn't get the answer I wanted, but quite the opposite. So how do you substantiate that claim?
It's good you go the answer you wanted, but overall this is hardly news. The vast majority of people here already knew that and the other answers. I ask you this? What's next? 1 question every day so the free advertising is always on the main page? Trust me when I say I have seen concrete evidence that this is nothing more than a way to increase the traffic to a certain website. It's not conspiracy when you see hard facts, it becomes reality.
Either that or it is just "free advertising" someone or another is after.
Be more specific? An update to a shareware program? How often is that? That is news. A driver update for mediator hardware? How often is that? That is news. An interview with an Amiga celebrity on another webiste? A genuine one is a rarity and therefore is news. A weekly Q&A with Fleecy
[color=FF0000]with only a link provided to the other site, and content not allowed to be reproduced here[/color] is NOT news, it's advertisement for that certain site and should be discussed in the forums, not as news.
