Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON  (Read 14133 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« on: December 10, 2004, 02:06:08 PM »
In the Netherlands, the Dutch Minister of Justice wanted to make it unlawful to hit a child. His argument: people should learn that it is not right to hit a child. Of course he was steamrolled by almost everyone: the law won't prevent serious child abuse (which was its main selling point), and parents should have the right to administer a corrective, educational slap. It is not a right to be taken lightly, of course, and should be avoided whereever possible.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2004, 03:10:25 PM »
My girlfriend told the following story: there was a TV documentary about manners, and how to raise children in such a way that they are polite and kind to others. So the makers of that documentary went to a school and filmed classes of children being taught Manners 101. At the end of the day, the children left class, but the teacher had a small gift for each of them (I think it was a piece of fruit, or a small sweet). Each and every child said 'thank you'. One of the parents, who was witnessing the entire event, came up to her little child, and said, 'Yes, but you've got to remember that Mizz Teach is a bit old-fashioned, you don't need to say thank you.'

Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2004, 05:10:52 PM »
Quote
Dan wrote:
Quote
Cymric wrote:
In the Netherlands, the Dutch Minister of Justice wanted to make it unlawful to hit a child. His argument: people should learn that it is not right to hit a child. Of course he was steamrolled by almost everyone: the law won't prevent serious child abuse (which was its main selling point), and parents should have the right to administer a corrective, educational slap. It is not a right to be taken lightly, of course, and should be avoided whereever possible.

The sad thing is that he was right.
It´s not okay to beat unknown people in the street or a shop that isn´t polite to you but it´s okay to hit your kid?

Most of what needed to be said was already put into words by many other posters---I simply forgot about this thread. I just want to comment on your reply.

First, the Minister was not right. His goal was to prevent serious child abuse by outlawing any form of contact other than a soft touch in 'neutral' areas. People who abuse their child will not be impressed one iota, and go ahead beating the child senseless anyway. Plus it doesn't do anything about psychological abuse, nor prevent other gruesome methods of torture. If you want to hurt children, you needn't do that by hitting them. Despite the fact I don't have any children, I can understand his worries and anxieties. But he is barking up the wrong tree, and fighting symptoms instead of working on, say, improved monitoring, keeping the anonymous hot line for child abuse open (it is most likely going to be closed), and making sure that all officials have the right information to have them step in quickly and quietly when necessary.

Plus it introduces the rather curious problem what to do about children hitting other children. That's just as bad as adults hitting children. Sometimes even worse since adults are supposed to know restraint and reason, despite them being much stronger. I speak from bitter experience of being the butt-end of a number of brainless bullies for a few years. (Their bullying only ended when I kicked one in the balls, causing him to walk funny for a day or two, and really hit another on the nose, causing a nose bleed of epic proportions. I was lucky I didn't break anything.) You want to try and get a law preventing this sort of thing through government? I give you a snowball's chance in Hell of it passing.  

Or what about administering drugs like Ritalin to active and difficult children to quiet them down and make them more 'managable'? I hear it's all the fashion these days. Is that okay?

Second, there is a not-so-subtle difference between hitting a child, and what I cryptically (and, in hindsight, rather anal-retentively) called administering a corrective, educational slap. With the latter I mean either a slap on the hand, or a slap on the buttocks. Never anywhere else, most especially the head. If you alter position, apply more force than you would apply during hand-clapping, or use anything other than an open palm, you're crossing the line. Period. That's when it becomes hitting, and people ought to seek out professional help if they did this more than once. (I think I got slapped about five times in my life, and only once in the face, but that was when I was 21 or thereabouts.)

Third, I specifically said that slapping really is a last resort. I would try peaceful methods first: moving things out of reach, taking away candy, not buying what the child wants. If that doesn't work: halting allowance, grounding them, putting them in their room, using psychological tricks. (My girlfriend told me she was once put under a cold shower, fully dressed. Harsh, but it got the job done quite effectively.) And only then, if all that fails, or if things demand immediate action, a slap. You're just as much crossing a line if you need to slap yourself out of every situation; other methods are often a lot more effective.

Finally, you really cannot compare hitting someone in the street with a slap you give a child when it's being headstrong, or throwing a temper tantrum.

That's why I have a hard time taking anyone serious who seeks to limit my (to be) paternal judgement by making the slap illegal. What's next on the list of things You Can't Do To A Child? Forbidding to send them to bed without dinner because it leads to malnutrition? Forbidding psychological tricks on ground of it hampering their mental development? No. Hitting children is Bad, but forbidding it won't solve anything, and giving a child a slap under very extreme circumstances is permissable.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2004, 11:50:34 AM »
Quote
Dan wrote:
Quote
Cymric wrote:
Or what about administering drugs like Ritalin to active and difficult children to quiet them down and make them more 'managable'? I hear it's all the fashion these days. Is that okay?

No it isn´t, its another symptom of the fact that educating and raising children aren´t allowed to take time or cost money.

We are in agreement then, although I will say that it should not be forbidden, either. If there are pressing medical reasons, the option should be there.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2004, 12:11:15 PM »
Quote
Dan wrote:
Was these bullies older than you?
What was the schoolyard rules? (I never understood why you was gay if you fought on a Thursday, maybe that one was started by tired teachers :lol:)

Yes, they were, one to two years. That doesn't mean much now, but as a kid of 6, it does. (I skipped grades which immediately singled me out.)

Schoolyard rules? They were made up on the spot, noone ever told me, and then I could of course be bullied because I didn't know them. The school administration had not experienced a grade skipper before; it was also viewed as a sign of parents pushing the child. (Which they never did.) Some parents were very vocal about that particular opinion, which caused a lot of tension. I was simply 'weird' and thus the perfect victim.

Quote
Quote
You want to try and get a law preventing this sort of thing through government?

No, by a changed attitude in the whole society.

This sounds very naive: kids will be kids. After all, deep down, they are still tiny little animals. But it is not my place to comment other people's ideals.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: BANNED FROM HOME FOR SMACKING SON
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2004, 12:39:25 PM »
Quote
Dan wrote:
Quote
People who abuse their child will not be impressed one iota, and go ahead beating the child senseless anyway.

People who are already are doing it now, no. But the changed attitude might influence some borderlines.

I doubt the number of cases would significantly decrease. In fact, it might even increase since the standard of what is considered 'abuse' has changed. That is dangerous

Quote
If they are closing that hotline at the same time then they are simply bigots!

Quite.

Quote
And are those people likely to do that?:-?

Not likely by themselves, true. What I meant was that they ought to be helped. Sloppy phrasing on my part, my apologies.

Quote
Quote
Finally, you really cannot compare hitting someone in the street with a slap you give a child when it's being headstrong, or throwing a temper tantrum.

NO?? How about the death penalty? Actually I think thats a better comparison.

The subject is obviously a very sensitive one for you, so I have to be careful with how I voice my opinion, which is very different from yours. So please try not to take this personal: I find your comparison of a slap on the buttocks to the death penalty excessively emotional, and way out of line. I am therefore not going to discuss this any further: I have made my point sufficiently clear already.

Quote
Slapping children is nothing but a quick fix of the symptoms much like the drug use you talked about.

Have you read the paragraph where I talked about when, in my humble opinion, a parent is justified to slap his child? Honestly, I don't think you have, otherwise I cannot imagine what caused you to write the above.

Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.