Michael Jackson - Peter Pan or Paedophile?

[Speelgoedmannetje]

because of Jackson after the first molestation case was settled out of court for millions

so yes he is guilty, he is a child molester.
Why didn't they treat him for this after the case was settled?

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Can mass-murderers also settle their cases? :nervous:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Karlos wrote:
Let a court of law establish the facts.

As it should be
but too many cases show that courts cannot be trusted either :-(

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Wayne wrote:

He sure seems to have some serious personal issues but that doesn't make him a child molester. Let a court of law establish the facts.

I certainly agree with that ideal, but then again, how many independently reported incidents do there have to be before at least one of them is true.  

Not necessarily, I mean, one can bring others to the idea, and it'll spread like fire...

[Speelgoedmannetje]

swift240 wrote:
I just dont know for 100% certain if he is or not, but then thats why the legal system is put in order to find out isnt it.

Of course, but why spending millions for avoiding legal system?

[Speelgoedmannetje]

T_Bone wrote:

redrumloa wrote:

T_Bone wrote:
What do you mean?

I think he means the child molestation case in the early 90's where MJ settled out of court with the family, for millions of dollars. The criminal case had to be dropped, because the victim withdrew due to being payed off.

Oh, yea, the "Why does he keep making millionaires out of Boyscouts" factor.
 :lol:

:lol:
btw. Red's right..