Seriously. Read all the prepared questions, read all the evasions, vague answers, and 1/2 truths given by Fleecy over the last 4 weeks and tell me it actually has a purpose.
@wayne
In regards to the "prepared questions"...I feel like I, like many others, have no "hidden agenda". I'm a nobody in Amiga land...I pretty much don't know anybody else in the Amiga Community and I am a lonely Amiga user her in Eugene, OR, USA. I'm guessing no one here knows me or has heard of me aside from a few posts here.
Anyway, my point is that I asked a question when this thing was first announced. I basically asked if they had thought about making AmigaDE available through web browsers similar to the way Flash or Java work. I thought that this would be cool if you could play DE games like people currently play Flash games or that you could write an entire web site in C or VP assembly or such. To my surprise my question did show up in the third round of questions. I thought Fleecy gave a pretty straight forward answer. That answer was no. I don't feel like he was "beating around the bush" or trying to talk his way out of an answer.
I'd just like to know what proof you have to substantiate your claim of "prepared questions".
You also said:
This is nothing more than marketing, and trying to satisfy those of you who want to hear from them even though they have absolutely nothing to say.
I didn't get the answer I wanted, but quite the opposite. So how do you substantiate that claim?
I'd also like to add that I feel that most of the stuff that gets posted as news these days (there is so little real news) is a bunch of fluff that shouldn't be considered news. Either that or it is just "free advertising" someone or another is after.
AmigaGuy
