The worst performance per watt of any CPU they'd ever used at that point.
...Performance per Watt?! Well, indeed, but also the best performance
per se that the PPC could ever offer...
As much as I like PPC, and I do like it
Personally, I have no "feelings" for PPC whatsoever. Why would I? Did you really believe so?
It's dead Jim, DEAD...!
it just cannot compete with current x86/AMD64 based architectures.
Are you kicking in open doors here?
The PA6T may be newer, perform better per watt and depending on which source you believe, better per MHz than the G5. The G5 may clock higher and ultimately perform faster, but whichever way you look at it, they are both obsolete. Thoroughly and utterly.
*Definitely* kicking in open doors then! (And the PA6T is everything but new...)
But it's better to pay 1/4 of the price for one kind of "obsolete" hardware, than paying £1500-£2000 for another "obsolete" hardware that performs **worse** than the cheaper one...
Finally, what will you do on your obsolete PPC platform of choice that requires either a G5 or PA6T that you can't already do more than comfortably on a G4?
Well, as I've said plenty of times before, I'm certainly not in the market for *neither* of these two.
But to answer your question, for one thing, I would hope they could play 1080p x264 streams. The Mac Mini does 720p (on MorphOS)
Last time I looked, there wasn't really any Amiga specific software in existence that really needs the horsepower that even these old processors can deliver.
Depends on your user pattern I guess.
Personally, I'm quite media centric. HD movies of today requires power!