So Piru's answer is not even bother trying?
@jorkany - That old chestnut again. Considering X1000 and SAM range contain AmigaOS they can be considered an Amiga. There are other threads devoted to nit-pickers I am sure.
(ME: Although the use of the word 'enemies' is probably misguided.)
(EASY JOHN: maybe it's not quite accurate translation. In Russia there are well-established expression "You're your
own enemy," it means that a person does something that will be worse for himself.
Without the support and regular production, although not very productive motherboard - platform dies, it's stupid not to understand. Anyone who says "I'm amiga-fan, but I will not buy a new board" is contributing to that development stops at all.)
Yeah I can understand that 100%. Problem is there a lot of people on this board who don't really support Amiga and just come here to whinge about 'how things could have been' and look back into the past too much.
easy_john wrote: that would create a new, relatively competitive platform
piru replied: No. Whichever way you look at it, it sure isn't competitive.
Lacking in some big areas yes, but the OS looks fairly up to par in the most important of areas:
* Program Launcher
* File Exploration
* Networking between Macs and PCs
* Internet, FTP, Email
* Desktop and Gui preferences etc
Sure things maybe a little less eye-candy, but pretty functionality. Once again it really depends on everyone's personal expectations of what an operating system should offer.
If you want amazing third-party apps you have to give developers a great system first and the new Amiga specs do exactly that for the AVERAGE user.. ie. the biggest userbase.