Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86  (Read 43406 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« on: October 26, 2010, 07:04:44 AM »
Quote from: tone007;587048
Bit of quick research..
You should know better than comparing MIPS values from two different CPUs, let alone architectures.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2010, 07:19:08 AM by Piru »
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2010, 08:15:03 AM »
Quote from: Hammer;590262
Anyway, AROS has emumiga. http://emumiga.com/about/
Well, I guess that's useful if you want to run the Clock application. Without alarm.

I fear the author is getting lost in his C++ quest (4 months now). I hope I'm wrong though.
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Ben Hermans still staunchly against x86
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2010, 11:19:11 AM »
Quote from: nicholas;590281
What's wrong with C++?

Not the C++ itself (althought I don't like it myself, it sure has some benefits in some case), but I fear the author might be losing focus. Just an example: I know several guys who keep working on the same project, reshaping it to whatever new ideas they have and/or technologies arising. The problem being that the actual project itself doesn't advance.