Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)  (Read 10766 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline psxphill

Re: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)
« on: November 07, 2011, 11:16:54 PM »
Quote from: fishy_fiz;666890
Browsing with an amiga browser inside winuae still exposes the host to any potential viruses you find there

You'd still be much safer than MacOS.
 
Just because it's possible in theory to pick up a virus through all those layers of abstraction, it would be very complex and little chance of any return on your investment.
 
It's about time winuae emulated a powerup card.
 

Offline psxphill

Re: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2012, 05:35:04 PM »
Quote from: Amiga_Nut;674090
Also it works just as badly if you try to get Windows to play HD content better by telling it the CODEC process needs to be "high" or "realtime".
 
It's like those options are fake and don't actually do anything haha

Why would you set a processor intensive process to realtime? I guess you had multiple cores or your machine would just become unresponsive.
 
If you did the same thing on amigaos then be prepared to wait until the process finishes before you can click on anything.