Gunnar doesn't appear to listen to his market, the market is so desperate that they are listening to him.
I disagree.
The analogy is that just because people buy things, doesn't mean it's any good.
I think that's a poor excuse for your reasoning. Clearly if Vampire did not have features people wanted they would go with a difference accelerator. There are reasons why Microsoft and Apple could sell an inferior product, none of which apply to the Apollo team.
Also if it were better (i.e. compatible fpu and mmu) then more people would want it.
True, but more people would also want it if it were:
- faster
- standalone
- had full AGA support
- etc.
FPU/MMU aren't the only features left to add.
That does fit my observations that apollo isn't meant for amiga, this is just a test ground so people can do his QA and marketing and then he'll be off.
Which explains why AGA support is such a high priority. Oh wait...
FWIW Commodore also had more people wanting to buy hardware than they could produce. It was the XOR patent license fee that did them in, not a lack of customers.
LOL! Commodore was in serious trouble way before then. You're looking back through rose colored glasses if you think Commodore would have lasted. The CD32 was OK, but was not going to save the company. Now, if you told me that AAA or Hombre or better, along with a new generation of machines was about to be released, I might be slightly on board.