Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why revive Amiga?  (Read 18041 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DavidF215

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 182
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
    • Cross Timbers Haven
Re: Why revive Amiga?
« on: June 11, 2003, 06:28:58 AM »
Speed, easy to use, just works. I really like the speed of the Amiga GUI and how it works. The closest to its speed are BeOS, QNX, and maybe MacOS X. Windows XP isn't quite as fast, but XP is faster than Linux on my Athlon 1900. IMO Linux is more bloated than XP, but that's for another forum. Amiga has a fast, smooth GUI. Amiga is simple enough for the technically challenged yet powerful enough for many power users. I'm getting to the point in dealing with computers (been with it since the Atari 2600/Intellivision) that I want something that is quick, is responsive, is simple to use, and is powerful enough to do whatever I want. Some Amiga programs may cause software failures, but at least a reboot is only 6 seconds compared to 30 seconds with XP, 60+ seconds on Linux. BeOS, which I use mostly for Internet and Email because my A1200 is not yet connected to my LAN, boots in about 7 seconds. The days when computers take more than 10 seconds to boot are over; this is the 21st century. In my technical support experience, Companies lose more money on employees having to wait long periods of time for their systems to reboot after a system crash than (no offense) workers who take many smoke breaks. My $0.02.

And one more thing. Amiga isn't dead nor is it rising from the grave. The Amiga was on temporary leave of absence.  :-)
AmigaOS enthusiast since 1993.
 

Offline DavidF215

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 182
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
    • Cross Timbers Haven
Re: Why revive Amiga?
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2003, 03:19:01 PM »
Quote

YttriumOx wrote:
Quote
DavidF215 wrote:
...60+ seconds on Linux...

Really?  On the Athlon 1900 you mention?  What ARE you doing to the poor thing?  


It's Red Hat 8.0. FreeBSD booted much faster, but the mouse in X freaked out under FreeBSD. X ran faster on FreeBSD, too, but that's for another thread. :-)
AmigaOS enthusiast since 1993.
 

Offline DavidF215

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 182
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
    • Cross Timbers Haven
Re: Why revive Amiga?
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2003, 03:34:27 PM »
Quote

smerf wrote:
5.  Never used an apple product and never will or
     shall I say that the only people using apples are
    plastic know nothings that don't understand what
    computers are about. These users are rated
    lower than Linux users and are even rated lower
    than winblows users in my book.


Go to CompUSA this week and try out their new OS X. I think that you'll find that it's pretty neat. I liked it a lot. It is a simple GUI with *nix power.
AmigaOS enthusiast since 1993.
 

Offline DavidF215

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 182
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
    • Cross Timbers Haven
Re: Why revive Amiga?
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2003, 09:39:25 PM »
Quote

Lwanmtr wrote:
I not only use a 4000t based flyer, but also a Dual 1ghz Mac, and I can do easier editing on it..and I can do live video switching..unlike Mac and premiere.


A Dual 1ghz Mac can't do live editing? I thought that it could, but I'm not into video editting yet either. Is there an extra hardware feature that could do live editting? Quite surprising if it can't.
AmigaOS enthusiast since 1993.