Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?  (Read 13246 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline iamaboringperson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« on: September 15, 2003, 11:06:49 PM »
For looks/sex appeal I would have say the A3000(UX), I love it and I would probably kill for one!!

For usability the A4000T is the nicest - and I do own one of those! :-)
 

Offline iamaboringperson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2003, 06:11:19 AM »
I was only mentioning the released Amiga's
Quote
A3000+
????
(I'll respect most of your orderings...)
Quote
A500+
A500
A2000
I'm confused by that one, the A500's better than A2000? No way!


 :-)


 

Offline iamaboringperson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2003, 02:19:40 AM »
My list of the worst Amigas ever!

#4 A1200 - People say you can expand this quite well. But thats only aftere hundreds or thousands of dollars worth of cases, expansion slot add-ons, little PCB's that plug into other little PCB's that plug into other little PCB's so that you have this great big wobly tower that is made of PCB's and connectors. Too many hacks are needed. Yuck.

#3 A1000 - Great start, however it had crap expansion, and no proper kickstart.

#2 A500 - No internal HDD, crap expansion.

#1 A600 - Missing keys, pathetic expansion.

IMO lack of standard expansion options, decent screenmodes for serious computing, and ####ty non-os-compliant software are the reasons for the Amigas death.