Time for AROS and Natami ?

[wawrzon]

even if the natami team, which seems mostly to be just one person that doesnt talk much, isnt going to deliver, jens schoenfeld has undertook some steps to catch up. (with his at the moment c-one based a-clone project). just to remind: the only natami version anyone have seen on *.jpg's was also c-one based. if i was interested in a performance comparable to a500 i would bought that and got involved immediately. for the moment i have enough a4ks here to bother, so i will wait till the 68k_softcore will be enabled to run at multiple50mhz speed. nothing is lost just yet and a-clone might need aros_68k as well.

[wawrzon]

@piru: well not anymore. the replacement chips phase is now over. the c-one enchancement phase is ment as a development stadium and shall lead to a product that of course will not be posibble to squeeze into c-one fpga's. but this is now the case. i do not know if you read german, but here is the dedcated thread on a1k forum: www_a1k_org/forum/showthread.php?t=13391

[wawrzon]

@bloodline:
well, the problem is, that of that 10$ gfx cards only voodoo series has some kind os warp3d support as far i know, both on classics/mediator (i have one) and above. so we seem to be seriously doomed to wait for that weird hobby superaga or for someone seriously dedicated to write warp3d drivers for something else.

[wawrzon]

@piru: i do not know. im not interrested in c_one or c64 as such for that matter. i was spectrum48 owner

no, serious: i think jens just want to sell some c-ones since they didnt get off once before

[wawrzon]

in a soft-render mode?

[wawrzon]

@bloodline: sure, but uae somehow always let me wait for something, be it displaying characters i have just put in. as i have already stated i would take any hw bwe it intel but i cant stand windows underneath.

[wawrzon]

no prejudice allthough i might be consider arrogant (sometimes). i use windows allright for what i need it. but, im not gonna pay ms to be able to run amiga, not after recent experience.

[wawrzon]

nor apple for that matter. i consider aos or compatible an alternative not an (questionable) extention or an abstraction layer for existing os'es.