Not saying that having support is bad, but that I am sick of people going "oooooo, 180+ chips, must be great."
What’s the other alternative?
It's not great, as AOS4 will never see a good portion of them. Also, too many people don't read the fine lines, nor do their research into the supported chipsets.
What kind of research are you referring to?
I happen to use SNAP in my OS/2 partition and find it very nice (better than the 16-bit OS/2 drivers for my Voodoo).
Good for you...
But this also brings up the second issue of AOS4 I don't like, inconsistancy. Which API will coders have to use, P96 or SNAP?
Asserting "inconsistency" would be subjective since you haven't seen the whole picture.
Refer to
http://www.amiga-news.de/en/news/AN-2003-02-00202-EN.htmlAlso refer to
http://www.scitechsoft.com/docs/snap_ga/notoc/index.html "SciTech SNAP drivers are source code portable between different microprocessor platforms, and the binary drivers are operating system portable within a particular microprocessor family. Hence the Intel x86 drivers can work on any 386+ CPU with any 32-bit operating system or environment supported on that CPU."