I have to agree with Wayne; there wasn't any real information in Fleecy's (God I hate that name) post. He's an arrogant goon spewing the same stuff we heard two years ago.
Further, Amiga Inc. should NOT be trying to influence which Amiga news sites are viewed and which aren't, and if they are, they're A) wasting their time and B) not busy enough getting a damned Amiga product out.
Honestly, I hope Amiga OS 4.0 sees the light of day soon; I'm excited about that product with the Amiga One. But I'm sick to death of hearing NOTHING from Amiga Inc. except the same nonsense. If they become a profitable, decent-sized company we hopefully won't have to deal with this political haggling in our tiny community anymore, we can then move on to political haggling with a much bigger community. I can live with having an Amiga Inc. that's annoying as long as they're successful (and don't do stupid things like Commodore and Apple), but so far they've been successful in just about nothing, except giving some guidance, reference designs, and desired featuresets to OTHER companies to do for them. Amiga Anywhere is certainly not a success by any stretch of the imagination yet.
Honestly, Amiga.org's going to be fine one way or another, no matter what Fluffy Fleecy says. I still believe we are the most viewed Amiga news site, and I don't think that will change no matter how many useless Q and A sessions he posts at other sites. I remember back when AO was in AI's "good graces" and that certainly didn't have any effect on us, either.
