Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: MorphOS ahead of AROS?  (Read 72112 times)

Description:

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show all replies
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: MorphOS ahead of AROS?
« on: April 05, 2012, 05:04:16 PM »
Quote from: spookyx;687131
Just my 2 cents......  I like winuae better than ether of these  :D


That's your choice. It's good to have choice and it's great that your happy with UAE. Maybe you'll get tempted by a Natami when it's ready and make the move over to hardware. Maybe the Natami super AGA will one day also be available within UAE. Either way, your not going past OS3.9 with it. MOS on the other hand can run a lot of the same software as OS4. I would like to see MOS for SAM, classic PPC, A1 and X1000 myself, but that's another story.
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show all replies
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: MorphOS ahead of AROS?
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2012, 06:18:25 PM »
Quote from: Lando;687182
This was discussed back in 2000'ish.  I seem to remember the original Escena AmigaOne design included a connection to the A1200 motherboard for just this purpose - access to the custom chips.

I can't see any benefit it would hold now, emulation is so much easier and probably more compatible.


http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/prototypes/amigaone1.html

Added a linky to Lando's post, he remembers correctly.

I would rather see a Natami-on-a board add-on for OS4 and MOS machines than a standard AGA add-on to be honest. That would be interesting.
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show all replies
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: MorphOS ahead of AROS?
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2012, 03:06:30 PM »
Quote from: phoenixkonsole;687296
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLWw1OpDrpI

The ideal war song for this thread.


For some reason I feel slightly nervous after watching that....  :/
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show all replies
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: MorphOS ahead of AROS?
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2012, 09:47:28 PM »
Quote from: HenryCase;687524
When it comes to video players, equal support of codecs does mean an equal product, by and large. All the rest is just bells and whistles on top of this core functionality. Think about how you use a video player.

1. Open video file.
2. Press play.

That's it. As long as the video player plays the file without incident, you don't really interact with it much. This is different from, let's say, spreadsheet software, where you're frequently interacting with the UI.



Most people use VLC as standalone video player.


@Terminills: I hate to say this but HenryCase has a good point, most people do use VLC as a standalone player. I know loads of people who use VLC daily (or close to daily). They use it because it plays damn near every bit of video thrown at it and the only button that matters is the play button. They also don't post on VLC forums and only visited the website once. That was when they downloaded VLC in the first place. These people are typical users, not people like you, HenryCase, or most other users of this forum. They are the same people who keep asking you to fix their damn PC when it goes wrong. ;)

As for media players, I find my original XBox with XBMC far more reliable for streaming than the PS3 and for the price you can get them for (£10 on ebay.co.uk being commonplace) you might as well stick one in every damn room. Add some NAS solution for storage of those ripped BD's and it's job done without your PC wasting electricity.
Falling into a dark and red rage.