that is what i think however if he wants to talk then talk. this hiding behind 20 questions is bugging me. if bill wants to make a statement then make one. if he feels that we have the wrong opinion of ainc, tell us.
the 20 questions are a way that issues (not covered by ususal communication) can be addressed(we have used it in lieu of direct communication) the 20 questions is not a pr campaign and should never be used as such imo. the lack of communication with the community (outside the 20 questions) shows a lack of pr knowledge/creativity or other reasons some good, some bad. i just feel that they should forego the 20 questions and just address the community in general.
all the 20 questions do is this
1 hey he is willing to answer 20 questions
2 time passes while questions are gathered
3 questions sent
4 time passes while questions are answered
5 answers recieved
6 answers posted - debate ensues
rather than waste all this time why not put forward what you want to say. we can skip 2-5 and go to the debate then he could follow up on his statement to clarify things. this might even lead to ainc and the community to mend the rift if they are persistant and honest.
