Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Again, Why didn't they port Amiga OS?  (Read 9065 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Holley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2004
  • Posts: 888
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.Front-Runners.net
Re: Again, Why didn't they port Amiga OS?
« on: November 20, 2004, 01:32:28 AM »
From the price of the A1 motherboards.

AROS shows what could have been, and it would have been a great OS (AROS is great, even though it's nowhere near complete).  I think modern x86 architecture deserves a decent lightweight OS, and that's not mutually exclusive with OS4 or MOS (however that ends up).
\\"Sex, drugs and rock n\\\' roll are very good for you\\" - Ian Dury
 

Offline Holley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2004
  • Posts: 888
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.Front-Runners.net
Re: Again, Why didn't they port Amiga OS?
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2004, 03:57:46 AM »
Quote
the advantage of something like AROS became pretty apparent
ok, now imagine AROS running in 64 bit, at 4GHz ...
\\"Sex, drugs and rock n\\\' roll are very good for you\\" - Ian Dury
 

Offline Holley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2004
  • Posts: 888
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.Front-Runners.net
Re: Again, Why didn't they port Amiga OS?
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2004, 05:20:07 AM »
9,995 are sat in a box waiting to be 'officially' fixed ;-)
\\"Sex, drugs and rock n\\\' roll are very good for you\\" - Ian Dury