that_punk_guy wrote:
You don't have to have sexual intercourse to abuse someone sexually.
I agree - but weren't we talking about "rape"?
The only definition for "rape" I know up to today is if a male penetrates a female with his penis *AGAINST HER WILL*.
That means:
No penetration - no rape!
Furthermore:
No erection - no penetration - no rape!
Sexual abusage is a different thing and does indeed not require sexual intercourse.
that_punk_guy wrote:
Also, various drugs can be used to lower the inhibitions of the person in question. That's still rape.
I think that's a matter of definition - and the definition differs from country to country.
According to my understanding those drugs just make it easier for a person to say "yes" (as long as this person is not unconscious).
And if one says "yes", then he/she wants it and so it can't be rape.
that_punk_guy wrote:
I know I've had an erection when I didn't really want one!
Are you sure that you "really didn't want one"?
I think it just hit you unprepared.
If you *REALLY* would have *RESISTED* to get an erection (e.g. by thinking of/concentrating on something really sad)
you certainly would not have gotten one!
8-)