Remember that the team gets to buy their systems first for testing purposes. By the time you can buy the production model, the '050 softcore may be already running 100% performance and the team will be working on the N68070 to be superscalar on top of that.
So what you're saying is, it's incomplete/unproven.
Right, that's all I needed to know. Get back to me when it's ready.
I don't listen to "maybes" any more.
BTW, if you try to run UAE on an ARM Cortex A8 (such as the Pandora), you'll see that it typically trips over itself and delivers roughly stock A1200 performance.
UAE != just 68k emulation. Comparison fail sir. Emulating the AGA chipset is a very processor intensive operation.
For the fastest '060 read the clock speed of this and weep:http://www.natami.net/gfx/NAe60F/NAe60F_1.jpg
And? Bernd Meyer of Amithlon fame was getting ~50% performance out of the 68k emulation he was using and by his own admission both the OS4 and MorphOS 68k emulations were far superior to his.
It's simple math. with a 3.67Mhz clock and 16 bit bus, how fast does a real Amiga move RAM? Now figure the speed of DDR2 which in burst moves what 8 bytes at once and there is cache to throttle it as well. Infact, for A500 games compatibility there will be a 3.67Mhz mode...
I asked for a citation, ie, benchmarks. This isn't it. And given that none of this has actually been proven, it's all academic.
No one claimed '060's were cheap nor that NATAMI will be cheap. Read the faq
http://www.natami.net/qa.htm
There is not cheap and
holy shit that's pricey! There is a very real danger that if it is too expensive it'll price itself out of the market. See the reaction to the X1000 for details.
If I was in on the bet, you'd owe me money...
I'd owe you sweet
FA chum.