Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Fleecy Moss Q&A Week 4  (Read 14082 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Warrent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 136
    • Show all replies
Re: Fleecy Moss Q&A Week 4
« on: April 08, 2003, 12:07:23 AM »
@ Wayne

"Then again, having heard substantial rumors lately of bank accounts closed and other interesting oddities, maybe they already have and news simply hasn't reached "Fleecy".

Humm Money.  I would hope that Amiga Inc would be up front and let the world know, that they are having money problems.  Oh well, so much for that.
 

Offline Warrent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 136
    • Show all replies
Re: Fleecy Moss Q&A Week 4
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2003, 12:14:24 AM »
@ TomasĀ 

I agree with you.  They are out of money and just do not want to tell us.  My only hope now, is that Eyetech will come out with the Amigaonge boards and that maybe OS 4, they are not part of Amiga Inc., so maybe.  Ya, it is a hope :)
 

Offline Warrent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 136
    • Show all replies
Re: Fleecy Moss Q&A Week 4
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2003, 12:29:30 AM »
@ SlimJim

"It is your website. You do whatever you like with it. But
please be honest about it "

Yup, I too hope that Wayne will look at his reason of not wanting Fleecy's Q&A linked here???  Heck, at the rate Fleecy is going most people will just skip the link here.  I too think there is more going on than just a isuse about news of Fleecy being linked here.  Like you said, it is Wayne site so, . . . he has the last word here.  I just hope that the same standard will be applied to all other news items :-)  In my opion, I have read other so called news items, that would not pass the Fleecy standard.  But the boss is the boss.
 

Offline Warrent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 136
    • Show all replies
Re: Fleecy Moss Q&A Week 4
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2003, 02:20:48 AM »
Quote
Please. For the love of all that is holy. Show me EXACTLY where I said this? How many times must I clarify that I think it's fine for what it is? What it is not a news item any more, it's no more than a recurring forum post.


I stand corrected.  I meant as a news item.  I too have seen other news items that were not up to the standard of Fleecy's new item.  I hope all news items will be held to the same standard :-)