Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Warp3D and a Radeon 9250 ?  (Read 4331 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lurch

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1716
    • Show all replies
Re: Warp3D and a Radeon 9250 ?
« on: July 18, 2014, 11:25:50 AM »
There was a Voodoo 3 forsale on Amibay for 10 GBP, has sold though. I'd post a wanted ad on there you'll usually get a quick reply and a better price than Ebay. :-)

Some people will say there's no speed difference between the Voodoo 3 and Voodoo 5 5500 but there is, and the extra RAM on the Voodoo 5 is great :-)

Only downside is that the Voodoo drivers only support one of the GPUs on the Voodoo 5 :-/
-=[LurcH]=-
A500 Plus Black 030@40MHz 128MB | A1200T 060@80MHz 320MB | Pegasos II G4@1GHz 1GB  | Amiga Future Sub
 

Offline Lurch

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1716
    • Show all replies
Re: Warp3D and a Radeon 9250 ?
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2014, 11:27:48 AM »
Quote from: carvedeye;769286
Well i managed to run in 640 x 480 with the radeon and by heck its slow, once i have got xmas out the way i will be saving my pennies for a new accelerator hopefully atleast an 060 :)


It will be slow as the Radeon doesn't support 3d so no hardware acceleration.
-=[LurcH]=-
A500 Plus Black 030@40MHz 128MB | A1200T 060@80MHz 320MB | Pegasos II G4@1GHz 1GB  | Amiga Future Sub
 

Offline Lurch

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1716
    • Show all replies
Re: Warp3D and a Radeon 9250 ?
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2014, 09:09:25 PM »
Quote from: matthey;769308
My Voodoo 4 performs better with deeper and higher resolution screens but my Voodoo 3 with SGRAM is faster in memory and for some 2D operations. The extra memory is nice but the extra cost is not unless finding a bargain. The Voodoo 4 doesn't need an extra power supply like the Voodoo 5 so it is more practical. The Elbox 2D drivers have problems with big endian modes on the Voodoo 4/5 and the latest voodoo.card and pci.library don't work at all. A Voodoo 3 3000 with SGRAM is competitive with the Voodoo 4/5 in a Mediator and is one of the fastest and best 2D/3D gfx solutions for any classic Amiga.

Would have to disagree, even Doom/quake runs a lot better with the Voodoo 5 card over my Voodoo 3. Plus workbench runs smoother and I can get 1920x1080 with high true colour (or whatever it is) so if one can get a really good deal (which come up quite often on Amibay) I'd get the Voodoo 5.

The display also looks sharper, doesn't compare to the ATI card for 2D though.

I can also over clock the Vooodoo 5 higher than I could with the Voodoo 3 and the gains can be seen in frame rate. The latest drivers work fine for me. As for it needing additional power  it's no different than plugging in a HDD so not really a good reason to not get a Voodoo 5 if you can.

So from a real world point of view Voodoo 5 ftw.

Currently I'm using 256MB of RAM from the Radeon 9200 as system memory and a 16MB from the Voodoo 5. Which proved to be the best combo for gaming 3d/2d performance.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 09:13:42 PM by Lurch »
-=[LurcH]=-
A500 Plus Black 030@40MHz 128MB | A1200T 060@80MHz 320MB | Pegasos II G4@1GHz 1GB  | Amiga Future Sub