Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer  (Read 1884 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ErolTopic starter

XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« on: March 31, 2016, 07:48:32 PM »
Hi community,

for those that have an Indivision Mark2 card either aga or ecs,  are you happy with them?

I wanna know if they work perfectly good on HDMI 1080P and if you get any ghosting..
workbench and games.. whats the output like.
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2016, 08:59:02 PM »
Quote from: Tygre;806610
Hi Erol!

I have an Indivision AGA 1200 MK2 and I love it, very nice quality of image! What is your experience with the XRGB-mini, is it worth the price?

Cheers! :)


Its a nice bit of kit and displays amazing picture on 1080P hdmi screens.  
so do you have any games that you recommend look amazing with your card?
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2016, 09:33:56 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;806612
I have Indivision's in all of my Amiga's and wouldn't use anything else.  Have connected them to a variety of monitors, TV's, projectors, etc., no issues.  Also they add additional screenmodes (SuperPlus 800x600, HD720, etc.) that you're not going to get with another adapter.  For my needs they work perfectly, obviously your mileage may vary.  ;)


Is it easy to configure Mike?    ive seen some youtube vids..  
Be great if people could post some pictures of games/software running on them.
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2016, 09:34:42 PM »
Quote from: Tygre;806614
Actually, I don't play so much as I have fun coding with the Cubic IDE, so for me it's mostly workbench... I am sure that others can share better experience with games than me :)


what size workbench screen you running cubic in?
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2016, 10:27:40 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;806619
The IndiECS is fairly easy to configure.  The config tool for the AGA versions is less user-friendly, but there's already a ton of threads about that in the forums.

I'll try to dig up some pictures later since I've taken a ton over the years and they're all on my computer at home now, but I don't really know how much that's going to help you.  Most of people's complaints about the Indi's is related to refresh rates / screen tearing / scrolling / Hz / not smooth blahblahblah.  Stuff you're not going to see in a photo, or even a video (once it's re-encoded to be posted on YouTube or wherever).

Again, my .02 cents, is that most of the people complaining about these things are just using crappy monitors or TV's, and dodgy bargin-bin cables, and if they'd STFU and just spend the money for a high quality display with a fast refresh rate they'd have much fewer problems.  But Amiga users are cheap and like to complain.  Can you tell this subject pisses me off just a bit?  :lol:


I may end up buying one for cd32 but as for other Amiga's ill consider it.  
It seems most people are happy with the Indivision.

As for complaining, yeah i have noticed but again we have a lot to smile about the Amiga is gaining ground slowly..  just wish they would hurry up with a low cost machine or an accelerator for the cd32, a machine that is under estimated.
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: XRGB-mini upscaler vs Indivision Flickerfixer
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2016, 10:58:57 AM »
Quote from: NovaCoder;806627
Indy AGA Mrk2 on an LCD 5:4 aspect ratio monitor.

[youtube]9tvYmamSH1k[/youtube]

Watch in HD for the full effect :)


looks great,  and games do u get that full screen?