Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Amiga Kit Amiga Store Iridium Banner AMIStore App Store A600 Memory

AuthorTopic: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux  (Read 2380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline strobe

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2003, 05:52:36 AM »
PS: Linus can suck my balls
 

Offline yoodoo

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2003, 08:19:04 PM »
you must be a big fan then.
 

Offline Ryu

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #17 on: January 09, 2003, 12:57:25 AM »
I have a friend who claims a G3@600 will only get 350 bogomips, someone please tell me how wrong he is :-)
Yours
Darren aka Ryu
-----------------------------
www.IntuitionBase.com
My Amiga 1200 webserver
 

Offline Ryu

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #18 on: January 09, 2003, 01:07:14 AM »
Sorry it gets 596.5 bogomips, and its a mos build of bogomips running on a pegasos, both the 604 and the G3 measurments were done under MOS.




I have theses images thanks to naTmeg, I would request that the links to them are not posted to anywhere else without my permission.
Yours
Darren aka Ryu
-----------------------------
www.IntuitionBase.com
My Amiga 1200 webserver
 

  • Guest
Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #19 on: January 09, 2003, 01:26:06 AM »
Well a Pegasos under Linux got also 1200Bogomips (It's logical btw ;) ).

So apparently AmigaMARK doesn't compute the Bogomips the same way.Or maybe it's not a native PPC version... Well according to the readme, AmigaMARK use the 68k emulator of MorphOS to run under the Pegasos so it's not PPC Native.
 

Offline KingTutt

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #20 on: January 09, 2003, 02:53:41 AM »
Quote

yoodoo wrote:
you must be a big fan then.


lol, now thats funny.
If I said I was the best you would think I am boasting. But if I said I was not, then you KNOW I am lying! ~Bruce Lee.
 

Offline naTmeg

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #21 on: January 09, 2003, 04:07:32 PM »
this is done on the mos-native version of amigamark.
i dunno why it get 1200 bogomips on linux.. :)
anyway..
 

Offline carls

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #22 on: January 09, 2003, 04:38:10 PM »
Here's some 68k bogomips ratings for comparison:


   68030/16 Atari Falcon     3.95

   68030/25 Amiga 3000       6.21
   68030/50 Amiga 1200      12.36

   68040/25 Amiga 4000-040  16.61
   68040/40 Amiga 1200      26.52

   68060/50 Amiga 1200      99.53  
   68060/50 Amiga 4000      99.74
   68060/66 Amiga CS MkII  132.71

(http://www.hobby.nl/~clifton/bogomips-3.html#ss3.11)
Amiga: Too weird to live, too rare to die.
 

Offline carls

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #23 on: January 09, 2003, 04:44:58 PM »
Oh, and this one:

Commodore 64                0.0033

:-D
Amiga: Too weird to live, too rare to die.
 

Offline Wilse

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #24 on: January 09, 2003, 05:05:17 PM »
Quote

strobe wrote:
PS: Linus can suck my balls


It can?
Now *that's* a feature I'd like to see implemented in AOS & MOS! :lol:

  • Guest
Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2003, 05:16:28 PM »
Quote

naTmeg wrote:
this is done on the mos-native version of amigamark.
i dunno why it get 1200 bogomips on linux.. :)
anyway..


Well there is no native MorphOS version of AmigaMARK according to the OFFICIAL readme I found on the OFFICIAL AmigaMARK website for the LATEST version of this software.

It says:

- Hardware: - ยท Amiga/Pegasos[JIT]

JIT == Just In Time
That's mean it use the JIT 68k emulator.

So I doubt a lot he has used the MorphOS PPC Native version AmigaMARK as this version doesn't exist apparantly ;) Or point me to a link where I can DL one. The only one I found was this one:
AmigaMARK Beta

Which is clearly not a MOS PPC Version, this archive contain only one binary which is a pure 68k binary. So please check your information before spreading them.

This would explain the huge difference between AmigaMARK result and Linux result because this kind of test can't really benefit of the JIT as it quite never reproduce the same operation 2 times and as you may know JIT compile at the first run of an operation (for the first run it's interpreted) and the benefit of this compilation appear only if it does this same operation a second time as it'll then use the dynamically compiled version. But in the case of BogoMIPS test this type of repetitions of an operation is not happening oftenly.
 

Offline lorddef

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2003, 06:23:52 PM »
My Dual P100 system gets 492 bogomips, My AMD Athlon 1.4Ghz gets 5870 bogomips.
Restraining orders are just another way of saying I love you!
 

Offline ple3003

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2003, 06:40:28 PM »
Quote
I dont think bogomips say anything about the perfomance at all.. From what i heard, its same no matter what cpu you have, a 1ghz pIII and a 1ghz athlon has same...


Of wich the athlon is way faster than the p3...

If so, why are you guys still making comparisons?
Isn't there a better way of measuring speeds?
bap bap bap bapbaaa
 

Offline Ryu

Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2003, 07:15:52 PM »
LOL the funny thing is as far as I am aware naTmeg wrote AmigaMARK, heck I betatested it for him under 68k here.
Yours
Darren aka Ryu
-----------------------------
www.IntuitionBase.com
My Amiga 1200 webserver
 

  • Guest
Re: Bogomips in AmigaOne Linux
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2003, 07:29:40 PM »
Quote

Ryu wrote:
LOL the funny thing is as far as I am aware naTmeg wrote AmigaMARK, heck I betatested it for him under 68k here.


Well in that case ok ;) But then it must not be the same algorithm than the one use in Linux 2.4.18 or maybe Linux use some G3/G4 optimisations (compiling or in the algorithm) to get the best result but maybe these optimizations are not yet implemented in the AmigaMARK MOS version of this test...

At least I know that on PC the Bogomips test is performed using different algorithms that are each optimised for MMX, SSE or other CPU specific instructions and keep the best result.