Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's  (Read 5252 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline curtisTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1049
    • Show only replies by curtis
    • http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/curtismc
Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« on: February 19, 2017, 04:20:10 PM »
Okay, this may be a moot point, but how does the plipbox compare to a more "normal" network interface card?

I know the plipbox is, obviously, much easier to acquire, but how does the throughput speeds compare?
Outside a dog, a book is a man\'s best friend. Inside a dog it\'s too dark to read! Groucho Marx

Curtis McCain

http://pages.suddenlink.net/curtismc/
 

Offline Matt_H

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2017, 08:10:26 PM »
I would imagine it's limited to the speed of the parallel port, so slower than a Zorro or PCMCIA card. Chief advantage is that it can be attached to Amigas large and small, so it's an easy way to get a 500 or CDTV on the LAN. Better to have a slow network than no network ;)
 

Offline paul1981

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2017, 10:23:15 PM »
Quote from: Matt_H;822440
Better to have a slow network than no network ;)


A hacker would agree with you. :laughing:
 

Offline curtisTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1049
    • Show only replies by curtis
    • http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/curtismc
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2017, 11:35:07 PM »
Quote from: Matt_H;822440
I would imagine it's limited to the speed of the parallel port, so slower than a Zorro or PCMCIA card. Chief advantage is that it can be attached to Amigas large and small, so it's an easy way to get a 500 or CDTV on the LAN. Better to have a slow network than no network ;)

That's pretty much what I figured.  So all the talk of a plipbox being 10MB is good right up to where it enters the Amiga!
Outside a dog, a book is a man\'s best friend. Inside a dog it\'s too dark to read! Groucho Marx

Curtis McCain

http://pages.suddenlink.net/curtismc/
 

Offline Pat the Cat

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2017, 12:47:11 AM »
This talk of "it's as fast as the parallel port it uses" are a bit vague.

While  all "built in parallel" Amiga ports are bits of complex interface  adaptor design, how they are read and written is in part down to which  software driver the pilipbox is using.

I would guess you get about 25KB a second maximum, but that's kilobytes per second. So not too shabby.

The  hardware latches on 8520s will work reliably at 56K, but how close the  various releases of driver have got to that hardware limit, I've never  tested. 1.3 versions of parallel.device were very iffy and clumsy IIRC.  Presumably later ones are faster and more reliable.
 
Some Zorro  cards have much faster parallel ports than the standard, obviously,  which might outshoot the average 10Mb (Megabit) per second Plipbox. That  would to a certain extent still depend on the processor of the Amiga  used. For instance an A2000 is still a 7MHz computer even with a very  fast Plipbox and much faster parallel port.
"To recurse is human. To iterate, divine."

A1200, Vanilla, Surf Squirrel, SD Card, KS 3.0/3.z, PCMCIA dev
A500, Vanilla, A570, Rev 5, KS 1.2/1.3 Testbench system
Rasp Pi, UAE4ARM, 3D laser scanner, experimental, hoping for AmigaOS4Arm, based on Watterott Fabscan Pi
 

Offline darkage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 583
    • Show only replies by darkage
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2017, 03:44:04 AM »
from a quick read it seems Plipbox will do around 0.2MB/s and Pcmcia has a max throughput of 2.5 MB/s (not sure how fast an actual Pcmcia network card would be in real life)
 

Offline PPC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 291
    • Show only replies by PPC
    • http://home.planet.nl/~seele069
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2017, 04:51:58 AM »
A500 With a vampire card the plipbox does up to ~130 KB/sec.
A600 with vampire and PCMCIA network card does 1,0 MB/sec easy over my internal network since my 10Mbit card will not go faster then that.
Amiga is addictive coz it is fun to use

A1200 Elbox power tower, BPPC 040/25+603e 240 Mhz, 128 MB RAM,Bvision,Zorro IV&Zorro IV PCI busboard,X-surf,Buddha IDE
A4000 Elbox power tower,CSPPC 060/60+604e 233Mhz, 128 MB RAM,CvisonPPC, AriadneII
A600+Vampire V2,A604N+RTC,SUM USB keyboard controller,Topolino with logitech wireless keyboard&mouse
 

guest11527

  • Guest
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2017, 07:26:12 AM »
Quote from: Pat the Cat;822457
Some Zorro  cards have much faster parallel ports than the standard, obviously,  which might outshoot the average 10Mb (Megabit) per second Plipbox. That  would to a certain extent still depend on the processor of the Amiga  used. For instance an A2000 is still a 7MHz computer even with a very  fast Plipbox and much faster parallel port.

Unfortunately, most of these cards are based on PC hardware, i.e. standard I/O chips designed for the PC. This typically implies that you do not have a fully bidirectional port, as in the Amiga case. As far as the CIAs are concerned, you can individually configure each line as either input or output. That does not go for a PC style parallel port where the data lines are fixed output lines, and only four lines are available as input.

In how far this limits Plipbox I cannot tell, but I would be astonished if it would work on such ports.
 

Offline pyrre

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2017, 12:03:17 AM »
Quote from: curtis;822432
Okay, this may be a moot point, but how does the plipbox compare to a more "normal" network interface card?

I know the plipbox is, obviously, much easier to acquire, but how does the throughput speeds compare?
A nice demo video of the plipbox on youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egi3MiSgV1k
Amiga 1200 Tower Os 3.9
BPPC 603e+ 040-25/200, 256MBram, BVIsionPPC, Indivision AGA MK2.
Amiga 2000 (rev 4.0) Os 1.2/1.3
2088 bridgeboard, 2MB ram card, 2091 SCSI.
Amiga 500+ Os 2.1
Derringer 030, 32MBram, Buddha in sidecar, Indivision ECS.
Amiga CD32
Video decoder
 

Offline QuikSanz

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2017, 03:28:49 AM »
@Curtis,

If you have a Zorro slot Keep your eye out for a Hypercom or IOBlix card.
High speed parallel ports at up to 560Kbps
High speed serial ports at up to 460Kbps
 

Offline clusteruk

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2017, 09:22:21 AM »
Hi

I have two plipboxes and I connect one to my A1000 with a 42mhz 020 and I get around 60KBytes per second if that helps. Where my Ariadne 2 gets about 225KBytes/sec.

Steve
Amiga 1000/3000, iMica Silent and NVidia Aros computer.
http://www.imica.net
Lets enjoy the Amigas future, THIS year is 25th Anniversary lets make it special.
http://www.amiga25.org
 

Offline Oldsmobile_Mike

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2017, 05:43:14 PM »
Quote from: QuikSanz;830746
If you have a Zorro slot Keep your eye out for a Hypercom or IOBlix card.
High speed parallel ports at up to 560Kbps
High speed serial ports at up to 460Kbps

Obvious question, but can the Plipbox handle such speeds (assuming you have one of the high speed parallel port cards)?  Has anyone tested this with one?
Amiga 500: 2MB Chip|16MB Fast|30MHz 68030+68882|3.9|Indivision ECS|GVP A500HD+|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|Cocolino|SCSI DVD-RAM
Amiga 2000: 2MB Chip|136MB Fast|50MHz 68060|3.9|Indivision ECS + GVP Spectrum|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|AD516|X-Surf 100|RapidRoad|Cocolino|SCSI CD-RW
 Amiga videos and other misc. stuff at https://www.youtube.com/CompTechMike/videos
 

Offline madgrizzle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 189
    • Show only replies by madgrizzle
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2017, 07:10:12 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;830820
Obvious question, but can the Plipbox handle such speeds (assuming you have one of the high speed parallel port cards)?  Has anyone tested this with one?


I was looking for a way to move the plipbox inside my Amiga 2000 and have been on the lookout for an IO card so I had easy access to a parallel port.  One was up on eBay and I bought it.  If no one else does, I will report back on my testing results when I get the card.  I have to read this:

http://lallafa.de/blog/2015/09/amiga-parallel-port-how-fast-can-you-go/
Only Amiga *woo-woo* Makes It Possible
Only Amiga   ... Makes.. It .. Happen!
Amiga 2000, 2MB Chip RAM, OS3.9, GVP Combo 030/22 13 MB, Supra 4MB
Amiga 3000, 16 MB RAM, OS3.9, A3640 v3.2 with 060 Processor, Picasso II, A2065, PCD-50B
Dead VA2000/CX :(
 

Offline Sir_Lucas

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 171
    • Show only replies by Sir_Lucas
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2017, 05:20:18 PM »
I've got a plipbox and a lot of different PCMCIA cards, both Ethernet and WIFI:

A1200 030 + FTP + Roadshow TCP/IP stack (copying to RAM:)
Plipbox - 72KB/s
10mbps - 500 KB/s
10/100mbps - 570KB/s
WIFI WPA2/AES - 120KB/s

A1200 060 + FTP + Roadshow TCP/IP stack (copying to RAM:)
Plipbox - 88KB/s
10mbps - 900KB/s
10/100 - 980KB/s
WIFI WPA2/AES - 270KB/s

A600 V600 FTP + Roadshow TCP/IP (copying to RAM:)
Plipbox - 134KB/s
10mbps - 1,0MB/s
10/100 - 1,8MB/s
WIFI WPA2/AES - 430KB/s

If you are interested in WIFI WPA2/AES PCMCIA cards then have a look here:
http://www.amibay.com/showthread.php?81221-25-x-WIFI-CARDS-LINKSYS-WPA2-AES-AMIGA-A600-A1200-PCMCIA-WIFI&highlight=linksys

If you are interested in Ethernet PCMCIA cards then have a look here:
http://www.amibay.com/showthread.php?72182-7-x-ETHERNET-CARDS-NETGEAR-amp-3COM-AMIGA-A600-A1200-PCMCIA&highlight=netgear
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 06:38:47 PM by Sir_Lucas »
 

Offline amiadudeorwat

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2017, 02:58:30 AM »
I have an A4000 with A2065 that gets about 1MB/s from FTP on local network.  Mediator Ethernet is about 1.1MB/s from FTP on local network.  

I don't understand why someone would buy a Zorro Parallel card then plug an also very slow plipbox into it.  

You can get an X-surf for a little more that is five times faster.