Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition  (Read 31364 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Snoozy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 251
    • Show only replies by Snoozy
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #104 from previous page: June 07, 2012, 11:51:51 PM »
Quote from: Damion;695661
Probably a good idea, I doubt anyone cares since you've never even owned an Apollo 1260. On the other hand, Jens' comments are fully respectable considering his background and expertise. The fact is all those old accelerators had their compromises, you just decide what's most important for you and enjoy the experience.

So you make sweeping comments for all on amiga org?

And i have tended to treat your comments with the same level of disregard
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 12:00:35 AM by Snoozy »
 

Offline tone007

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #105 on: June 08, 2012, 12:02:36 AM »
I got a great deal on Apollo 1240 once, 25MHz and I overclocked it to 32Mhz.  I don't recall it being any less reliable than my Blizzard 1260.  I'd grab another.

Bought an ACA630 once, and it didn't work on one of my A600s.

Hard to get 100% success with 20+ year old hardware.
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline Damion

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #106 on: June 08, 2012, 12:15:58 AM »
Quote from: Snoozy;695662
So you make sweeping comments for all on amiga org?


No, the only person I was talking to was you. You haven't any experience whatsoever with the hardware in the topic. Yet, you feel confident enough to jump in here and smugly parrot someone who is an actual respectable expert (Jens), to the annoyance of people that likely have owned a dozen or more accelerators over the years. Cyberstorms, Blizzards, Apollos, you name it. Can you say toolbag.

Quote
And i have tended to treat your comments with the same level of disregard


LOL, I could really care less.
 

Offline Snoozy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 251
    • Show only replies by Snoozy
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #107 on: June 08, 2012, 12:21:34 AM »
Quote from: Damion;695666
No, the only person I was talking to was you. You haven't any experience whatsoever with the hardware in the topic. Yet, you feel confident enough to jump in here and smugly parrot someone who is an actual respectable expert (Jens), to the annoyance of people that likely have owned a dozen or more accelerators over the years. Cyberstorms, Blizzards, Apollos, you name it. Can you say toolbag.



LOL, I could really care less.

(yawn) Another dimwit out of reach of the facts.

And of course i'm going to comment on ACA cards since i own one (and a blizzard)
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 12:26:01 AM by Snoozy »
 

Offline Damion

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #108 on: June 08, 2012, 12:30:13 AM »
--comment deleted--
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 02:06:36 AM by Damion »
 

Offline paul1981

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #109 on: June 08, 2012, 01:37:35 AM »
Quote from: Snoozy;695580
What's the point of scraping by on an (overheating) apollo card which is about to give up its magic smoke.

If anyone is "scraping by", then that would be you with your ACA.
I own a Blizzard1260 and it's slow, it runs as hot as an 040, and I keep it as a backup card incase my Apollo1260 dies.

Quote
Also Apollo cards are usually the cheapest of all -£ for hz - (and lose more % value  more than any other card)
I have to disagree here. Any 040/060 card is highly sought after and fetches good money. If you had one you wouldn't want to sell it anyway.

Quote
Purchasing (or defending) apollo cards is pretty much a lost cause and my support is to ACA and Jens :)
Why wouldn't I want to defend my Apollo? It's given me nothing but flawless performance for many years. I've never had any issues of stability or incompatibilty whatsoever. I believe half of the problems people have with any 040/060 cards are down to incorrect CPU library files and incompatible libraries....so basically just dumb users. Those types tend to stick to 030's.
 

Offline NovaCoder

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #110 on: June 08, 2012, 03:26:43 AM »
This is all getting kind of off topic but....

I was after a Blizzard 1260 but had to settle for an Apollo instead.

So far it's 100% stable and also fast and compatible (even seems to work with WHDLOAD games/demos without any config changes).

BOOM
The Dig
Quake
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 04:47:32 AM by NovaCoder »
Life begins at 100 MIPS!


Nice Ports on AmiNet!
 

Offline AmiDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 903
    • Show only replies by AmiDude
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #111 on: June 08, 2012, 11:17:33 AM »
Quote from: Snoozy;695656
Yes the best thing about the apollo cards is the cpu on them; as Individual Computers have documented the rest of the card is based on design error and functions on the basis of luck and possible compatibility with the mobo revision.


That's a lie! Individual Computers can make a "document" of anything, but that doesn't mean it's true. I've got 3 Apollo boards, and all are 100% functional and stable. And I'm not alone; there are many other happy Apollo owners.
Like I stated before: It's the ACA 1230/42 accelerator from Jens that causes problems with some A1200 motherboard revisions.
I think Jens bought the Apollo rights because he was scared that someone else would buy it. By doing so, he eliminated all potential competition. And the whole "unstable Apollo" story is one big lie!
 

Offline gertsy

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2006
  • Posts: 2318
  • Country: au
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show only replies by gertsy
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~gbakker64/
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #112 on: June 08, 2012, 12:06:05 PM »
Quote from: AmiDude;695691
That's a lie! Individual Computers can make a "document" of anything, but that doesn't mean it's true. I've got 3 Apollo boards, and all are 100% functional and stable. And I'm not alone; there are many other happy Apollo owners.
Like I stated before: It's the ACA 1230/42 accelerator from Jens that causes problems with some A1200 motherboard revisions.
I think Jens bought the Apollo rights because he was scared that someone else would buy it. By doing so, he eliminated all potential competition. And the whole "unstable Apollo" story is one big lie!


Jens has done so much for Amiga.  It is possible someone might have scooped up the Apollo stuff for production, but unlikely, and if was opened up it would be doomed to fail.  The market is so small.  Regardless of the competition argument I am 100% confident Jens is best placed to have the opinon he does.  Right or wrong it's not a lie.  It's the opinon of an excellent electronics technician who produces the only regularly available new hardware for classic amigas.
The apollo horse is well and truly dead.  I have an opinion that 110 posts is enough flogging.

Err like over it already.
 

Offline AmiDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 903
    • Show only replies by AmiDude
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #113 on: June 08, 2012, 12:46:40 PM »
Quote from: gertsy;695692
The apollo horse is well and truly dead.



On the contrary, the Apollo is still alive and kicking *ss!
 

Offline tone007

Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #114 on: June 08, 2012, 01:55:39 PM »
Don't mess with Apollo!

3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline gertsy

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2006
  • Posts: 2318
  • Country: au
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show only replies by gertsy
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~gbakker64/
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #115 on: June 08, 2012, 02:28:05 PM »
Quote from: tone007;695696
Don't mess with Apollo!



Yo Adrian, Wouldn't dare!
To be clear (If I wasn't) My comments weren't in regard to the existing hardware. They were all about the promise of resurection. I luv classic hardware. But I also understand that's what it is.
 

Offline AmiDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 903
    • Show only replies by AmiDude
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #116 on: June 08, 2012, 03:18:25 PM »
Quote from: tone007;695696
Don't mess with Apollo!



:roflmao: :laughing: :rofl:
 

Offline Snoozy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 251
    • Show only replies by Snoozy
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #117 on: June 08, 2012, 03:24:27 PM »
hmmm a few scenes later and apollo was dead
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 03:32:57 PM by Snoozy »
 

Offline LaserBack

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 340
    • Show only replies by LaserBack
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #118 on: June 08, 2012, 04:39:51 PM »
yep the story about apollo boards are buggy and unstable is a big big lie
anyways if we have to compare between 030 accelerators the best one is still the blizzard 1230 mk4 ...and was designed 17 years ago
The new ACA 1230 boards are small and looks cheaper in my eyes...even the apollo 1230 series were better designed,they have a socket for fpu and have optional scsi
also I never heard of problems or stability issues on apollo 1230 cards,however the apollo 1240 and 1260 sometimes are a bit problematic
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 04:43:55 PM by LaserBack »
 

Offline jsixis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 156
    • Show only replies by jsixis
Re: Jens Shoenfeld's anwer to the Apollo petition
« Reply #119 on: June 12, 2012, 04:16:14 AM »
Apollo boards are junk