Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A2000 which is better  (Read 3545 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show only replies by Dimitrios
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #14 from previous page: May 31, 2012, 05:56:36 PM »
Here is the answer from the seller :

 
>The board had some slight damage I fixed it and sprayed 'plastic'on it. >looks dark. the connector was cleaned and functions are ok.

 
So should I get the 6.2 ?
 
Also what is a fair price for it guys ? (1MB & 1FDD)

 
Thank you :D
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show only replies by Dimitrios
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2012, 07:26:18 AM »
I also found this oen guys : What do you think ?
I post ad description

Amiga 2000 Rev 6 1988. Power supply not working and with PC ATX power supply there is no boot floppy disk screen.
Included is PC Pentium 3, 1.4Ghz quasi board (not bridgeboard) which can plug into ISA card slot of Amiga 2000 as an expansion.
PC Floppy and DVD Rom, Memory, Soundcard, USB ports with backplane, and  Pc ATX Power supply with AT Converter to plug onto Amiga 2000  motherboard to power PC Card.
 
Amiga Floppy Drive and broken Amiga 2000 PSU.
 

Offline _ThEcRoW

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2005
  • Posts: 753
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by _ThEcRoW
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2012, 02:10:56 PM »
That pentium 4 card is strange. I never heard of a p4 class expansion for amigas. In the case the card is real(probably, as socs like that exists in embedded market), i doubt you could use it in your amiga.
Amiga 1200 desktop. Apollo 030/50 Mhz 8mb ram + ClassicWB + Wb 3.1
Amiga 500 + ACA500Plus + 16gb CF | ECS Power!!!
C64 DTV + Keyboard mod. Waiting for a 1541 disk ve...
Mac Mini G4 1.42Ghz 1gb OSX(tiger)/Morphos 3.7 Registered
C64mini + usb drive with loads of games...
 

Offline Markus_Bieler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 369
    • Show only replies by Markus_Bieler
    • http://www.traumstation.ch
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2012, 02:48:14 PM »
Quote from: Dimitrios;694790
So should I get the 6.2 ?


Go for the 6.2. The only advantage of the A2000 4.0 Braunschweig, you can jumper that one with the help of the ramcard in the CPU-socket and the A1000 bootroms the way that it acts like a real A1000.

The A2000 6.2 on the otherhand could easely upgraded to 1mb or 2mb Chipmem.

And remind both are stoneage in the spirit of computertechnology

Markus
 

Offline Markus_Bieler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 369
    • Show only replies by Markus_Bieler
    • http://www.traumstation.ch
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2012, 02:56:27 PM »
Quote from: _ThEcRoW;694997
That pentium 4 card is strange. I never heard of a p4 class expansion for amigas. In the case the card is real(probably, as socs like that exists in embedded market), i doubt you could use it in your amiga.


You can pop in every CPU card that fits. The only different between a "Bridgeboard" and a stanbdard industry CPU-card is the "bridge" between Amiga and Intel. The industry card just gives you a second independent Computer in the A2000 and you need keyboard mouse gfx etc. twice.

(sorry for offtopic)

Markus
 

Offline gertsy

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2006
  • Posts: 2318
  • Country: au
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show only replies by gertsy
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~gbakker64/
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2012, 01:54:57 PM »
Sounds like spare parts.